|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The triples datamodel
And negotiate. Sorry, Elliotte, but we really do negotiate. Hopefully, we have a standard schema. Yep, we really do use those. For the industry I'm in, that is currently Global Justice XML. Here's an example. A programmer develops a web service for returning arrest information. Arrest information is related to incident information, but at the heart of both is a Name entity. To do this, a PersonType is defined because names can name businesses and people. Now comes the fun. Another entity is Alias (the kind an arrestee gives when they want to disguise their identity). Is Alias just another name or is it a name of type PersonType? The naive answer proves to be wrong. JusticeXML gets this definition right, but without it to appeal to, we have to negotiate for much longer. Costs go up for even a single negotiation so one can envision the cost savings as hundreds of producers and consumers come online. The tradeoff for not having to buy wall-to-wall systems from a single vendor IS commodization pressure by standardization. len From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@S...] The rush to standardization of everything XML should tell us that people value meta-data with broad scope. However, people constantly try to get ahead of the game and institutionalize their metadata without having any proof of its value. Personally, I'll write no schema before it's time, and never consider a schema the final world...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








