|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathrea
Hi Joshua > So the "data" that you get from an HTTP GET is not really conceptually > different from the other "metadata about a URL" that we might talk > about. If you wrote it in triples, you could conceptualize that: > > s: http://www.netcrucible.com/blog > p: dc:Author > o: allenjs@h... > > s: http://www.netcrucible.com/blog > p: ns:representation > o: <html><head><title>Better L.... > from the knowledge modeling point of view: good inference! So in your RDF blob (the gizmo containing the triples) you would consider each triple as a representation of that resource. Good idea. It sounds like an phenomenological approach, a triple being a representation of the phenomena you obtained through an intention (i.e. an action to get it). So then you need a filter to make it an RDF triple since it doesn't come packaged that way. Bill is right then, without a signal processor it doesn't work. Anyway, conceptually it sounds good, practically I need to get from you the proper RDF blob and the filter that will transform a simple HTTP GET into an RDF triple to input it into your RDF blob (or maybe the RDF blob can directly get it and absorb it). Anyhow, if we refer to RDF statements as representation I am for it, it's a good enough term. Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








