|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathrea
Hi Michael, > So "metadata" is "content" transformed into a more conveniently > machine-processable form? OK, that does explain a lot of points that I > wasn't understanding in your, or Dare's or Joshua's arguments. It's > not what I thought of as metadata, or what Doctorow is flaming. I > guess we need a meta-model of metadata to keep this all straight! > Yes it seems that some people are looking at the RDF framework as a way to encode records or frames (i.e. data) and others see it as a way to encode meta-data about data. The problem is that we do not always know the reference context. So maybe we should develop the reflex to ask: Are you talking about RDF as a way to encode a set of properties or as a way to publish meta-data about some data? Note to anybody who is willing to help the community: polish the sentence (my English is poor sometimes when I type faster than my editing brain :-) and publish it. We will copy and paste it in future messages about the semantic web Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








