[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:

• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:31:16 -0400
• In-reply-to: <p0601020ebce78c6d9c42@[192.168.254.88]>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E520204DCEA@R... t.com> <40C12862.7000405@c...> <p06010209bce75434669f@[192.168.254.88]> <40C1D5F4.6070504@c...> <p0601020ebce78c6d9c42@[192.168.254.88]>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 10:17 AM -0400 6/5/04, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> 
> 
>> Mary
>>    hasEyes
>>       color:blue
>>       shape:round
> 
> 
> 
> Wouldn't you really say:
> 
> Mary
>    has
>      Eyes
>       color:blue
>       shape:round
> 
> "hasEyes" seems stretched to me. It mixes a predicate and an object that 
> naturally seem distinct.

Yes, you probably would, and I am just working up a longer post on 
representing that in quasi-striped rdf/xml format.  It should be along 
shortly.  I think that the point here, though, is that most (ordinary) 
xml leaves off the extra layer, whether it is the noun or the verb.

Cheers,

Tom P

Explorer's Guide the the Semantic Web (Manning Books)
http://www.manning.com/catalog/view.php?book=passin

• References:
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf?
• Next by Date: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Previous by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread