Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:
At 9:56 PM -0400 6/4/04, Thomas B. Passin wrote: >Right, an arbitrary piece of xml does not carry enough information >to let you automatically distinguish between elements that represent >things and those that represent properties. A person generally has >to work that out. But when you do have a properly striped format, >it can be easy to turn into rdf (it's usually just about there as >is). Why is there a distinction between "things" and "properties"? Isn't a property a thing? Can't a property have properties of its own? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format