[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web pe

• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• From: John Cowan <cowan@c...>
• Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:11:43 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., wperry@f...
• In-reply-to: <p06010201bce8cea45047@[192.168.254.88]>
• References: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOKEAAEMAA.howardk@f...> <p06010208bce75195c8e6@[192.168.254.88]> <40c9aa34.248723415@s...> <p0601020dbce76af8bfc8@[192.168.254.88]> <40C243E6.9060602@a...> <1086511960.3929.23.camel@l...> <p06010206bce8a5118be2@[192.168.254.88]> <6.1.0.6.2.20040606125229.028514e8@p...> <p06010201bce8cea45047@[192.168.254.88]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> The fallacy here is that a document has some sort of processing 
> expectation, but this is simply not true in the heterogeneous world 
> of the Internet. The document is what it is, and will be processed 
> differently by different actors. I likely do not want to do the same 
> thing with the same document as you do, nor is it necessary that I do 
> so. The demand that we provide and adhere to schemas is often little 
> more than a demand that we process documents in only certain 
> preapproved ways. That is a fundamentally limited perspective. It may 
> work within one program or a small organization. However, it does not 
> scale to the needs of large organizations and groups of organizations 
> with different, unique objectives.

Walter Perry, are you listening?  Your Fichte has been found!

-- 
Henry S. Thompson said, / "Syntactic, structural,               John Cowan
Value constraints we / Express on the fly."     jcowan@r...
Simon St. Laurent: "Your / Incomprehensible     http://www.reutershealth.com
Abracadabralike / schemas must die!"            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Previous by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread