XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - November, 2003

• XML Testing and Tuning. - From: prithi navala <prithi777@y...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• RE: Parsing XML with special characters (Perl XML::Parser) - From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• Re: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE:Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Michael Leventhal <hanagid@e...>
• RE: XML Schema for Patents - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• XML Schema question on key, keyref constraints - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: XML Schema for Patents - From: "Eamonn Neylon" <eamonn@x...>
• Re: XML Schema (sequence) and MSXMLDOM question. - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• XML Schema (sequence) and MSXMLDOM question. - From: "Rodrigo Pinho Pereira de Souza" <rpinho@f...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: "Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech)" <bconrad@t...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>
• Re: date type validation with XML Schema - From: <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Re: Parsing XML with special characters (Perl XML::Parser) - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Parsing XML with special characters (Perl XML::Parser) - From: "Carlos Prim" <guadalteba@h...>
• Re: XML Schema for Patents - From: Bob Wyman <bob@w...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: XML Schema for Patents - From: Mike Rawlins <mcr@r...>
• XML Schema for Patents - From: "Aaron Bawcom" <aaron_bawcom@i...>
• Re: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML Schema Question - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE:Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Mayne, Peter" <PeterMayne@a...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• Re: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Jim Ancona <jim@a...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: [www-vrml] x3d-3.0.dtd validation errors - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: [www-vrml] x3d-3.0.dtd validation errors - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: date type validation with XML Schema - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• date type validation with XML Schema - From: "lgngri" <lgngri@h...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binaryXML...) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation - From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• RE: XML Schema Question - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>
• Re: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML SchemaQuestion - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question - From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>
• RE: XML Schema Question - From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>
• Re: XML Schema Question - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binaryXML...) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• New programs (semantics, grid computing, web services, service-oriented architecture, ebXML) - From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: XML Schema Question - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: Standards for ASN.1 support of EXTENDED-XER now freelyavailable - From: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Standards for ASN.1 support of EXTENDED-XER now freely available - From: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Docbook grief - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• XML Schema Question - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Comparison of Xml documents - From: Robin LaFontaine <robin@d...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Off-topic: More Korean Language - From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Re: XML Conferences - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: joseph.a.gilvary@c...
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• ANN: XMLOpen Conference - From: "eamonn@x..." <eamonn@x...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: "AMARNADH SAI ELURI" <amarnadh@i...>
• Off topic - Korean language - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• [offtopic] Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Re: crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• RE: crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• RE: crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• crimson package in j2sdk1.4.1 - From: "AMARNADH SAI ELURI" <amarnadh@i...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Wyman <bob@w...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Jim Ancona <jim@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Mike Rawlins <mcr@r...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Baiss Magnusson <cascades@e...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Relating to XML - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Relating to XML - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Relating to XML - From: Mike Rawlins <mcr@r...>
• RE: Relating to XML - From: "Chris Wilper" <cwilper@c...>
• Re: Merge xml documents with SAX - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Relating to XML - From: Baiss Magnusson <cascades@e...>
• RE: Merge xml documents with SAX - From: "Chris Wilper" <cwilper@c...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@S...>
• Merge xml documents with SAX - From: Dongling Ding <dling61@y...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@S...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter, uphill both ways [...] - From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• RE : Comparison of Xml documents - From: GARNIER Pierre <pgarnier@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Q: xml, xsl and web interface - From: "Kuntal Daftary" <daftary@c...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• RE: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread] - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread] - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Re: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread] - From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread] - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread] - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• RE: Comparison of Xml documents - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• ANN: Syntext Serna V1.0.1 XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor - From: xml-dev@n...
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Re: Quick question related to XQuery - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Quick question related to XQuery - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Quick question related to XQuery - From: George Richard Russell <George.Russell@c...>
• Re: Quick question related to XQuery - From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
• Re: Comparison of Xml documents - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Comparison of Xml documents - From: GARNIER Pierre <pgarnier@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Fat clients/thin data (Re: RE: Why can't we all work together? XML UI Languages Abound) - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• XUL Alliance Wiki Wiki Now Live - From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
• Re: Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• RE: Quick question related to XQuery - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• RE: Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Quick question related to XQuery - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Fat clients/thin data (Re: RE: Why can't we all work together? XML UI Languages Abound) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Quick question related to XQuery - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Faster processing without schemas? (was Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: Dave Malcolm <david@d...>
• Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: Re: When is the XML PI <?xml?> required ? - From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Two mistakes found in XML 1.1 Proposed Recommendation - From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter, uphill both ways [...] - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: When is the XML PI <?xml?> required ? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Differencing XML tool for big file - From: Stephan Wiesner <swiesner@l...>
• RE: RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Bob Wyman <bob@w...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Dave Butler" <butlerdi@m...>
• Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...] - From: Stephan Wiesner <swiesner@l...>
• Re: XML storage structure - From: akmal chaudhri <akmal@s...>
• Call for Papers: DATAX Workshop 2004 - From: akmal chaudhri <akmal@s...>
• Re: Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Dave Butler" <butlerdi@m...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• Re: XML storage structure - From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>
• Fat clients/thin data (Re: RE: Why can't we all work together?XML UI Languages Abound) - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Word 2003 schemas available - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Blog Pruning - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter, uphill both ways [...] - From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...) - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• DDF, ISO 8211 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• RE: Word 2003 schemas available - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Updating document with SAX - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Re: When is the XML PI <?xml?> required ? - From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Microsoft FUD on binary XML... - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Blog Pruning - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Blog Pruning - From: Joel Bender <jjb5@c...>
• RE: Word 2003 schemas available - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Word 2003 schemas available - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• RE: Word 2003 schemas available - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• RE: Word 2003 schemas available - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
• Blog Pruning - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
<