[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)

• To: "'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:19:00 -0500
• In-reply-to: <004001c3b2b9$fafaf330$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>

bob@w... (Bob Wyman) writes:
>Yes, I'm a "platonist" as far as this discussion goes

It's good to know this permathread goes back 2500 years or more.

Personally, I keep hoping a philosopher-king will arrive and outlaw
Platonism in this field utterly.

No signs of that at the W3C, of course.

• References:
  • RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Relating to XML
• Next by Date: Re: Relating to XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Next by thread: Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread