|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
I am reading (some of) these passionate exchanges and I have a hard time getting passionate myself one way or the other. It seems one side thinks the main seeling point is the capability to store/stream structured text, while the other side wants to use the same principal mechanisms for data. Well, text is just a (very portable) way of encoding data. On the other hand, why not use similar mechanisms for storing/streaming data with other encodings? Yes, XML/SAX is about text, but one can abstract out the more general concepts and apply them differently. Maybe its just a turf war about names. Why not call it BinSAX then, or similar? If I send "7" or "007" or one byte as 00000111 or a 32 bit big endian integer, the recipient has to make sense of it, hopefully in a way that relates to the underlying data. And let's not get confused by encoding artifacts that may or may not be meaningful, depending on what we communicate about. "7" = "007", or maybe not. Karl
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








