Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML SchemaQuestion
Betty Harvey <harvey@e...> writes: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > >> Thanks for your endorsement, but XSV is not the gold standard -- as >> the status page  makes clear, there are implementation gaps and >> known bugs, to say nothing of unknown bugs. >> > > Please forgive me if this sounds like a 'rant'. Are there any 'gold > standard schema parsers? I think the situation is better than you suggest. Without being specific in a way which would be inappropriate given my W3C position, I would say that my experience over the last six months is a significant decrease in interop problems among the three or four best schema processors. Unfortunately one of the ones _not_ in that category is also one of the most widely used/distributed, which skews people's perceptions. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format