[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:37:44 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-84D8A161122B11D88BED0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

> I fear a lot of us have been backed into dogmatism or perhaps even
> didacticism by the perverse activities of the organization you
> represent.  There likely were better paths worth considering than "this
> is just text", but the amount of pain the W3C has inflicted in its
> specifications for creating typed XML has left a lot of us convinced
> that such work is foolish, pointless, or dangerous.

I'd feel a little better if you included "and its members" whenever
you go off like that.
        /r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread