[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents

• To: Ed Day <eday@o...>
• Subject: Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:36:39 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <038b01c3b360$81c6d630$483e0942@objsys1>
• References: <000601c3b30d$e4e25210$21f7fea9@aldebaran> <038b01c3b360$81c6d630$483e0942@objsys1>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Ed Day scripsit:

> From a practical standpoint, an ASN.1 SET construct is roughly equivalent to
> an <xsd:all>.  Both allow the elements defined within to be transmitted in
> any order.

In a word, the difference is that SET says the transmission order has no
meaning, whereas xsd:all says the order might or might not mean something.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. 
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• References:
  • RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schema Question
• Next by Date: XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation
• Previous by thread: Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Next by thread: RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread