[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Simple Question

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Simple Question
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:46:00 +0100
• In-reply-to: <3FB06D42.6040705@o...>

one fairly simple way to view the matter of attributes and content is 
that xml is a means to encode annotated hypergraphs. each element is a 
node which is the origin for a single multi-destination link to the 
respective children. the attributes are annotations on this 
multi-destination link.

the generic identifier can be seen as either a label on the node or as 
an additional annotation.

the annotations could, in general, be graphs, but attributes do not 
take direct advantage of that potential. they do, however, support 
references which permit one to encode such annotations.

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 06:01 AM, Ramkumar Menon wrote:

> I appologize if this is the wrong place to send this question.
>
> My question is:
>
> What was the fundamental motivation for having attributes in an XML 
> Document ? Whatever that can be contained in an attribute of an 
> element can be contained within a sub element. If I model an XML 
> Document as a Java object, would I need to distinguish between the 
> elements and attributes ? Moreover, why was it decided that attributes 
> can only be of a simple type ?

...

• References:
  • Simple Question
    • From: Ramkumar Menon <ram.menon@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Simple Question
• Next by Date: RE: Simple Question
• Previous by thread: Re: Simple Question
• Next by thread: RE: Simple Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread