[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

• To: "'Alaric B Snell'" <alaric@a...>, "'John Cowan'" <cowan@m...>
• Subject: RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:31:08 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3FBE14F9.7010204@a...>
• Reply-to: <bob@w...>

>John Cowan wrote:
> Of course, a *real* PER encoding of your email would be to 
> encode the author as 01, and then leave the content to be 
> reconstructed by the receiver.  :-)
Alaric B Snell wrote:
> Am I that predictable? :-)

	Does this imply a new, objective measure of the information
content of a mail message? i.e. the size of the PER encoding?  Today,
many people have mail filters that reject messages that are too large.
Perhaps in the future, they would filter out  all 1-byte messages
instead... :-)

		bob wyman

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by Date: Merge xml documents with SAX
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread