[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Q

• To: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>
• Subject: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:59:14 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311251358510.1455-100000@e...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311251358510.1455-100000@e...>

At 2:26 PM -0500 11/25/03, Betty Harvey wrote:

>Different parsers also handle namespaces differently also. Some see it as
>'text' which is the way the namespace spec says it should, while other
>parsers go looking for the URI in the namespace and if it doesn't find it
>fails.

Who's doing that? That's just plain wrong. Are you sure you aren't 
just misinterpreting error messages? I've seen a few users get 
confused by XMLSpy error messages that appeared to say something like 
that, but it's not what the parser was actually doing.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• References:
  • Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
    • From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Next by Date: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Previous by thread: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread