[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blog Pruning

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Blog Pruning
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:00:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EF56@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EF56@h...>

At 1:15 PM -0600 11/18/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Something totally off the wall, but I think some
>here might have informed opinions:
>
>Should blog owners prune their blogs?  Should
>they prune responses that are not in agreement
>with the theme of their blogs?

At an absolute minimum, you need to prune the spam; e.g. offers for 
penis enlargement pills. I tend to feel you should not prune more 
than the absolute minimum. (i.e. it's also a maximum). The slashdot 
self-moderation system is very interesting. IT allows everything, but 
tends to hide the "first post/Natalie Portman/Pour Hot Grits Down My 
Pants" posts. It also makes it much easier to finds the best, most 
thoughtful replies in large threads.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• References:
  • Blog Pruning
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Blog Pruning
• Next by Date: RE: Blog Pruning
• Previous by thread: Re: Blog Pruning
• Next by thread: Re: Blog Pruning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread