[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SA

• To: "Alaric B Snell" <alaric@a...>,Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Subject: Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:19:24 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <000f01c3a614$7a3e3600$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <p06002002bbd2da85adc7@[192.168.254.4]> <3FAD8B8D.4000200@a...> <p06002009bbd35b67f5db@[192.168.254.4]> <001701c3a677$36f8a610$0207a8c0@karl> <p06002001bbd3f55ecb26@[192.168.254.4]> <E4BF8118-12CA-11D8-B61F-000A95CCC59E@x...> <3FAE8532.7090501@p...> <3FAEDD9A.3030705@a...>

Well, we have implemented "SAX-like" which I guess is what you experts are
now calling "SAD".  Is that good enough for "proof of concept"?

Regards,

Ed Day

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alaric B Snell" <alaric@a...>
To: "Bill de hÓra" <bill.dehora@p...>
Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:36 PM
Subject: Re:  Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re:
 SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)


> Bill de hÓra wrote:
> >  Plus if it's really that simple, why can't some of
> > the ASN.1 folks build a SAD engine as proof of concept?
>
> They may well, they're just focussing on standard SAX to start with,
> since there's already an installed base of ContentHandler-implementing
> classes to talk to :-)
>
> > Bill de hÓra
>
> ABS
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>

• References:
  • RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Docbook grief
• Next by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Previous by thread: Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Next by thread: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread