XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - November, 2013

• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 22:59:20 -0000
• Re: ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 20:03:42 -0000
• Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, thisproperty must be preserved: semantics
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 19:35:57 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 19:15:02 -0000
• ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2013 18:04:01 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net> on 30 Nov 2013 15:12:26 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 07:48:46 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 30 Nov 2013 06:36:28 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 29 Nov 2013 21:23:37 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 21:00:19 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 20:35:39 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 20:24:02 -0000
• Re: RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 19:33:19 -0000
• RE: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this propertymust be preserved: semantics
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 19:18:07 -0000
• Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Nov 2013 18:15:29 -0000
• Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, thisproperty must be preserved: semantics
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 29 Nov 2013 17:03:10 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Nov 2013 16:46:31 -0000
• RE: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 29 Nov 2013 15:54:08 -0000
• Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics
  • From gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com on 29 Nov 2013 15:30:04 -0000
• In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property mustbe preserved: semantics
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 15:10:13 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 13:00:41 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 08:44:19 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 06:19:14 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 06:06:21 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 29 Nov 2013 03:48:20 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Nov 2013 23:23:20 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 23:06:25 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 28 Nov 2013 22:45:50 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From "Tony Graham" <tgraham@mentea.net> on 28 Nov 2013 22:08:58 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Nov 2013 21:22:46 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From "Tony Graham" <tgraham@mentea.net> on 28 Nov 2013 17:07:32 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Bev Corwin <bevcorwin@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 16:51:25 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 16:45:24 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org> on 28 Nov 2013 15:13:20 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 28 Nov 2013 11:13:07 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 28 Nov 2013 10:49:26 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 28 Nov 2013 08:03:43 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 07:51:22 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 07:45:35 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpslsolutions.com> on 28 Nov 2013 07:35:30 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Damian Morris <damian@moso.com.au> on 28 Nov 2013 07:04:26 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 06:47:38 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 05:20:57 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 05:00:26 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 04:03:03 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net> on 28 Nov 2013 03:20:27 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 02:37:47 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 28 Nov 2013 02:32:00 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 28 Nov 2013 01:52:03 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Nov 2013 00:36:45 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpslsolutions.com> on 27 Nov 2013 23:47:55 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 22:36:03 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 21:07:04 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 20:26:59 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 27 Nov 2013 18:28:57 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 17:19:45 -0000
• undermining hierarchies in books (was Re: How to do XMLdesign, per Jackson Structured Design)
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 27 Nov 2013 16:49:23 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 27 Nov 2013 15:51:37 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 27 Nov 2013 15:32:30 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 27 Nov 2013 15:11:50 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 12:04:24 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 09:38:17 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 27 Nov 2013 08:21:24 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 27 Nov 2013 08:12:18 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 07:23:57 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 07:15:13 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpslsolutions.com> on 27 Nov 2013 05:33:26 -0000
• Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 04:17:18 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 04:08:13 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 03:24:16 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 03:18:08 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 03:08:47 -0000
• Fwd: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 02:54:55 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 02:42:55 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 27 Nov 2013 01:56:38 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 01:33:26 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 27 Nov 2013 01:17:36 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 01:03:08 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 01:02:39 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 27 Nov 2013 00:47:59 -0000
• Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:34:04 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:32:18 -0000
• RE: Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:26:16 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:23:24 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:08:46 -0000
• Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:04:21 -0000
• Re: XML as fall guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:01:36 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enable efficient application processing?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:01:20 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:51:45 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:51:01 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enable efficient application processing?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:48:54 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:46:27 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 26 Nov 2013 21:56:45 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 26 Nov 2013 21:38:13 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 26 Nov 2013 21:28:33 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 26 Nov 2013 17:58:52 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 26 Nov 2013 16:08:05 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 26 Nov 2013 15:20:23 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 26 Nov 2013 14:40:45 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 26 Nov 2013 14:38:03 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ?SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Cecil New <cecil.new@gmail.com> on 26 Nov 2013 11:51:35 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 26 Nov 2013 01:29:46 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 25 Nov 2013 19:16:06 -0000
• making of Lux
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:51:44 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:34:58 -0000
• OT++ RE: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool forxmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:15:42 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 25 Nov 2013 18:04:10 -0000
• Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Nov 2013 17:13:34 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jhgriffith@gmail.com> on 25 Nov 2013 16:27:54 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Nov 2013 15:40:50 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ?SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 25 Nov 2013 15:32:37 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?= <bansp@o2.pl> on 25 Nov 2013 14:51:49 -0000
• Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:42:59 -0000
• OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:24:16 -0000
• Re: XML As Fall Guy
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 25 Nov 2013 14:09:45 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:07:49 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 13:16:05 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 25 Nov 2013 12:38:47 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From Jeremy H. Griffith <jhgriffith@gmail.com> on 25 Nov 2013 12:35:37 -0000
• The pure essence of XML: these are the acceptable strings
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Nov 2013 11:51:12 -0000
• Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 11:21:14 -0000
• Re: XML as fall guy
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 24 Nov 2013 22:29:02 -0000
• Re: XML as fall guy
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 21:03:39 -0000
• Re: XML as fall guy
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:37:20 -0000
• RE: Binary versus Text
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:18:42 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Jeremy <jhgriffith@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:05:27 -0000
• XML as fall guy
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:39:46 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:24:30 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 16:01:29 -0000
• RE: Binary versus Text
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Nov 2013 15:50:11 -0000
• Re: Binary versus Text
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 15:40:36 -0000
• Binary versus Text
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Nov 2013 14:26:16 -0000
• Re: RE: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Rand McRanderson <therandshow@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 14:11:21 -0000
• Re: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 23 Nov 2013 22:48:18 -0000
• Re: RE: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Bev Corwin <bevcorwin@gmail.com> on 23 Nov 2013 21:17:59 -0000
• RE: RE: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Nov 2013 21:06:32 -0000
• Re: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 23 Nov 2013 20:54:34 -0000
• Re: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:53:29 -0000
• Re: RE: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 23 Nov 2013 17:38:03 -0000
• Re: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:33:38 -0000
• RE: The universality of "single starting point"
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:02:44 -0000
• The universality of "single starting point"
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Nov 2013 16:51:20 -0000
• <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 22 Nov 2013 19:42:45 -0000
• Has Roger's Brain Been Altered?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 22 Nov 2013 16:21:25 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From William Velasquez <wvelasquez@visiontecnologica.com> on 22 Nov 2013 15:17:13 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 22 Nov 2013 15:00:34 -0000
• Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD,and namespaces?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Nov 2013 14:48:50 -0000
• RE: if namespaces vanished
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 22 Nov 2013 12:45:58 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 22 Nov 2013 03:42:37 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 03:42:28 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Nov 2013 03:35:10 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 22 Nov 2013 03:17:31 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 22 Nov 2013 03:07:06 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 22 Nov 2013 03:00:28 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 22 Nov 2013 02:13:47 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 22 Nov 2013 02:00:43 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 01:33:59 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:43:02 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:35:19 -0000
• Re: if namespaces vanished
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 00:22:53 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 00:19:24 -0000
• if namespaces vanished
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:16:35 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:04:52 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 21 Nov 2013 21:24:44 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 21 Nov 2013 20:43:06 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enable efficient application processing?
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 21 Nov 2013 17:16:10 -0000
• How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 21 Nov 2013 14:23:30 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 21 Nov 2013 10:41:43 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 21 Nov 2013 08:52:14 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 21 Nov 2013 07:36:54 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 21 Nov 2013 05:27:09 -0000
• Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 21 Nov 2013 02:27:45 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 21 Nov 2013 02:18:56 -0000
• How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Nov 2013 23:19:40 -0000
• Seduced by markup, Take 2
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Nov 2013 16:43:36 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 15:34:28 -0000
• Re: Seduced by Markup
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 14:42:22 -0000
• RE: XML -- information architect, JSON -- programobjects, HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddleprogramming and info architecture
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 20 Nov 2013 13:50:34 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 20 Nov 2013 02:01:20 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:44:17 -0000
• Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair, was Re: Designinginformation for eternity
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:42:07 -0000
• RE: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:38:59 -0000
• Cognitve Complexity: A Suggestion for Improving XML Designs
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 01:19:58 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:19:17 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:04:15 -0000
• Cognitive Dimensions of Notations
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 00:44:57 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 00:42:33 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 00:29:07 -0000
• Re: Seduced by Markup
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Nov 2013 00:05:54 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 19 Nov 2013 23:30:46 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 19 Nov 2013 22:57:28 -0000
• RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 19 Nov 2013 22:28:03 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 20:19:51 -0000
• RE: Designing Information for Eternity
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 19 Nov 2013 17:42:07 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 16:42:51 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 19 Nov 2013 15:43:18 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 15:09:05 -0000
• RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 19 Nov 2013 14:52:53 -0000
• Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 14:38:47 -0000
• Re: Designing information for eternity
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 19 Nov 2013 13:54:10 -0000
• Re: Designing information for eternity
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Nov 2013 13:30:06 -0000
• Designing information for eternity
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 12:37:22 -0000
• MicroXML APIs and MK Namespaces by Convention
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0000
• How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enableefficient application processing?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 10:42:18 -0000
• Re: Re: Seduced by Markup
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Nov 2013 03:02:03 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 01:37:10 -0000
• Re: Seduced by Markup
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 18 Nov 2013 19:30:54 -0000
• Re: RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 18 Nov 2013 17:25:30 -0000
• Re: Seduced by Markup
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 16:40:17 -0000
• RE: Seduced by Markup
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 18 Nov 2013 16:07:37 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming andinfo architecture
  • From davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 18 Nov 2013 09:09:50 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 08:59:36 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 05:15:21 -0000
• Re: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 03:32:21 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 02:39:38 -0000
• Re: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 02:30:17 -0000
• Re: Off-topic: Re: [OT] Re: Lessonslearned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 02:03:17 -0000
• RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XMLexperiment
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 23:42:37 -0000
• Re: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 23:01:34 -0000
• Re: A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame
  • From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 22:45:51 -0000
• A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Nov 2013 18:25:14 -0000
• RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 18:23:18 -0000
• RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:56:28 -0000
• RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:32:22 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:07:16 -0000
• What Is XML, or MicroXML?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 17:05:06 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:01:28 -0000
• Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:45:07 -0000
• Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:37:03 -0000
• Re: Off-topic: Re: [OT] Re: Lessonslearned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 16:27:23 -0000
• Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:49:30 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:42:33 -0000
• What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessonslearned from the XML experiment
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:38:46 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 14:59:34 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 14:45:15 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 17 Nov 2013 12:51:58 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 12:07:30 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 11:10:25 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 09:44:59 -0000
• Off-topic: Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from theXML experiment
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Nov 2013 09:14:05 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Nov 2013 08:56:47 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 08:55:59 -0000
• Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 17 Nov 2013 08:35:17 -0000
• "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learnedfrom the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 08:03:45 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 17 Nov 2013 07:36:09 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 17 Nov 2013 07:20:11 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Nov 2013 00:55:45 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 00:32:37 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Nov 2013 00:16:15 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 16 Nov 2013 23:38:40 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 23:16:45 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 16 Nov 2013 23:05:56 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:57:13 -0000
• Re: Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:52:23 -0000
• Standards and Antitrust (was: seduced by markup)
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:31:51 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:31:24 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:17:38 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:14:50 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:05:43 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 22:02:52 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 21:45:20 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 16 Nov 2013 21:04:26 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 16 Nov 2013 20:48:43 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 16 Nov 2013 18:16:14 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 16 Nov 2013 17:22:54 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 16 Nov 2013 16:38:44 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:50:17 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:40:44 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:26:04 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:14:49 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:12:34 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:10:38 -0000
• Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 16 Nov 2013 14:07:34 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 14:06:04 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 16 Nov 2013 14:00:26 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 13:50:41 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 12:16:26 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Nov 2013 11:38:06 -0000
• XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Webbrowser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and infoarchitecture
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Nov 2013 10:32:47 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2013 10:23:45 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Nov 2013 10:08:46 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 08:45:02 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2013 05:51:33 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2013 04:49:16 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 16 Nov 2013 04:24:50 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 16 Nov 2013 04:08:55 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 03:22:19 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Nov 2013 03:11:48 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 16 Nov 2013 00:13:06 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 16 Nov 2013 00:03:51 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 23:59:08 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 23:49:46 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 23:25:00 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 23:10:20 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 15 Nov 2013 22:54:48 -0000
• Vikings (was seduced by markup)
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 22:17:26 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 22:08:13 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 15 Nov 2013 21:46:52 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 15 Nov 2013 21:35:07 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 15 Nov 2013 21:33:01 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 15 Nov 2013 21:13:45 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 15 Nov 2013 20:30:02 -0000
• RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XMLexperiment
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 15 Nov 2013 20:09:17 -0000
• Re: URIs
  • From Chris Maloney <voldrani@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 20:05:20 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 19:55:23 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:53:11 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:52:07 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:42:18 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:41:02 -0000
• Re: seduced by markup
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:35:09 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:30:52 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 18:14:50 -0000
• seduced by markup
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:59:05 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:56:55 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:37:14 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:32:54 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:17:50 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:11:52 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:05:56 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:01:50 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:55:37 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:55:05 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 16:49:47 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:48:17 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:46:34 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:45:21 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:43:04 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 16:39:01 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 16:36:48 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:31:07 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 16:28:06 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Tony Graham" <tgraham@mentea.net> on 15 Nov 2013 16:17:01 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 16:05:37 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:57:46 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:47:32 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:40:05 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:35:14 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:24:17 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:21:36 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Bev Corwin <bevcorwin@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:21:10 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:05:54 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:03:27 -0000
• Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:00:05 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 15 Nov 2013 14:57:42 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 14:36:43 -0000
• [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 13:35:00 -0000
• Re: Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 13:27:43 -0000
• RE: Terminology: data interchange format or data exchangeformat?
  • From "Toman, Vojtech" <vojtech.toman@emc.com> on 15 Nov 2013 13:18:00 -0000
• Re: Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 13:05:13 -0000
• Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Nov 2013 12:53:24 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 15 Nov 2013 12:50:06 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2013 12:47:11 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 12:29:34 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2013 12:15:41 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 11:37:36 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 15 Nov 2013 11:36:31 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2013 11:09:35 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 09:48:58 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 04:38:36 -0000
• Re: URIs
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 23:00:07 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 22:56:58 -0000
• Re: URIs
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 19:24:00 -0000
• Re: URIs
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 19:16:39 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 14 Nov 2013 18:52:31 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 18:34:18 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 18:24:03 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 18:18:37 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 18:06:02 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 14 Nov 2013 18:01:11 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 17:05:35 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:48:46 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:39:40 -0000
• URIs
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:37:32 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:17:39 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:14:25 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 16:13:15 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 14 Nov 2013 16:11:31 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 16:08:09 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 16:04:50 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 14 Nov 2013 16:03:48 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 14 Nov 2013 16:00:06 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 14 Nov 2013 15:58:30 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Nov 2013 15:44:09 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 15:36:43 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 15:32:59 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 14 Nov 2013 15:32:22 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 14 Nov 2013 15:17:42 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 15:09:24 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Nov 2013 14:50:25 -0000
• RE: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 14 Nov 2013 14:41:09 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 14:34:21 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 14 Nov 2013 14:30:03 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 14:20:42 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 14 Nov 2013 14:08:02 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 13:54:15 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 14 Nov 2013 13:52:13 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 14 Nov 2013 13:49:32 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 14 Nov 2013 13:47:23 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 19:48:06 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 13 Nov 2013 18:49:01 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 18:27:42 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 13 Nov 2013 17:13:31 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Nov 2013 16:43:11 -0000
• Re: Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:55:43 -0000
• Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:06:49 -0000
• RE: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 13 Nov 2013 14:46:27 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 13 Nov 2013 11:55:36 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 11:31:09 -0000
• Fwd: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 10:50:50 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Nov 2013 08:45:25 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 06:58:24 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 05:42:31 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 05:17:40 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 03:09:19 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 00:21:34 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 00:12:58 -0000
• Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 12 Nov 2013 22:01:23 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 12 Nov 2013 18:16:23 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 18:04:12 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 12 Nov 2013 17:45:36 -0000
• RE: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 12 Nov 2013 17:37:17 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:36:14 -0000
• RE: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:29:50 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:28:05 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:17:17 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:11:48 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 12 Nov 2013 16:53:47 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not
  • From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:30:08 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:18:05 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier, difficult things more difficult
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 12 Nov 2013 16:03:13 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 15:46:42 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 15:17:45 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 12 Nov 2013 15:02:33 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 12 Nov 2013 15:00:22 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:57:06 -0000
• Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:44:36 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:41:57 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:36:08 -0000
• Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 14:32:59 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:31:30 -0000
• RE: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 14:16:56 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:07:26 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 12 Nov 2013 14:02:25 -0000
• Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 13:47:28 -0000
• Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier, difficultthings more difficult
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 12:36:55 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 12 Nov 2013 06:27:19 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Nov 2013 00:40:21 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 11 Nov 2013 23:20:40 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 11 Nov 2013 22:05:25 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 11 Nov 2013 21:28:46 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 11 Nov 2013 21:17:56 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 11 Nov 2013 19:48:56 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 11 Nov 2013 19:34:32 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Nov 2013 18:34:37 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 10 Nov 2013 17:17:25 -0000
• Fwd: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 10 Nov 2013 17:04:29 -0000
• RE: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 10 Nov 2013 15:00:16 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 10 Nov 2013 09:17:33 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Nov 2013 09:05:13 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 10 Nov 2013 08:41:35 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 10 Nov 2013 08:16:01 -0000
• RE: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 9 Nov 2013 17:26:15 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Nov 2013 17:24:53 -0000
• Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:58:45 -0000
• Best options for converting JSON to XML
  • From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:26:32 -0000
• Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 9 Nov 2013 00:33:45 -0000
• Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?
  • From =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?= <bansp@o2.pl> on 8 Nov 2013 22:43:27 -0000
• Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 8 Nov 2013 20:54:59 -0000
• Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 19:04:27 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 8 Nov 2013 18:15:52 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Nov 2013 14:51:34 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 8 Nov 2013 11:29:04 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 8 Nov 2013 11:14:32 -0000
• Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 8 Nov 2013 11:05:41 -0000
• Lessons learned from the XML experiment
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 10:31:46 -0000
• Re: How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 7 Nov 2013 23:37:28 -0000
• How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 22:15:50 -0000
• Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 7 Nov 2013 16:18:08 -0000
• Parsing
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 7 Nov 2013 15:32:26 -0000
• Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 15:17:28 -0000
• Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:42 -0000
• Re: Moving xml technology development outside of w3c
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:15 -0000
• Moving xml technology development outside of w3c
  • From Rand McRanderson <therandshow@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:35:14 -0000
• Re: Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 4 Nov 2013 14:10:01 -0000
• Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Nov 2013 17:20:28 -0000