[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Less
On 11/17/13 9:44 AM, Pete Cordell wrote: Mostly I no longer give a damn, but when I do:So Simon, to bring it up to 17 times, you've said why XSD/Namespace etc doesn't work for you, but I'm not clear what your methodology is instead. How do you go from concept to version 1 product to version 2 and so on? How is change managed and how do you verify that nothing has died as a result of those changes? <http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol10/html/StLaurent01/BalisageVol10-StLaurent01.html#d146424e677> At this point I've largely left the XML universe in any case, except conversationally. XML spoiled me early with a smart and active community - there really aren't equivalents in related technology. My hopes for a path forward in markup, though, are largely on the HTML side, rekindled by the slow emergence of Web Components and supporting standards. I suspect that those will do more to push the world toward markup than anything else we've come up with, unless they're strangled by the standards/implementer process. Yeah. If you want to use XML for that, go ahead, but it's not a case where XML is necessary or best. You'll find various references to those situations in the paper too.Note that my use-case is more the computer-to-computer one, where the XML is often conceptually an API boundary that more than one party works to. Thanks, -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|