[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
Actually, I knew zip about markup until 1998. I just pretend to be an old fart in this community.
Well, the obvious one is that of being a bus format, so that instead of N * M conversions in your enterprise, you need only N + M. In that case, the format may be *completely* different from any of the inputs or outputs, as it needs to be comprehensive for all of them (and others as yet unthought-of).
I whispered that more quietly and smiled when I said it, so I kept my job. Sometimes, people use <quote> and <para> and <emph> just so nobody can say they're doing HTML. When I was doing sales engineering in an earlier life, I ran onto this on the client side. Client: We want an XML feed. Me: Our HTML feed is well-formed XML, so you can just use that.
Client: No, no, you don't understand. It has to be an *XML* feed. Me: It *is* an XML feed. Client: ... Me: .... GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|