|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:16:59 +0000
We are talking about names for XML vocabularies. Why do names for XML vocabularies have to be distinct from names of astronomical bodies, published books, java packages, people, or web pages? The idea of one naming scheme for everything is unworkable.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Michael Kay wrote: "So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom? How come I didn't notice?" Do you think the comparison is appropriate? Compare the scope within which reliable identification must be achieved: Java code finding Java code; and anything finding anything. How come you didn't notice? Hans-J��n
> > No, I can't in this specific use case. However, AFAIK there isn't a > published, standards track grammar for your example. So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom? How come I didn't notice? Michael Kay Saxonica

[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|