[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable
============ However much this list may despise them, namespaces are pretty well baked into the political landscape of XML standards development. I doubt they'll go away in that context Thanks, Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/ ================ One Footprint makes a line ... I personally dont get the big hubbub about namespaces==evil. I understand in well too much detail how awful it is and how it makes everything hard and how newbies fall over themselves (I did ) but in the end ... is it really harder than in java having to do System.out.println("Hello World"); when in C I could do : printf("hello World\n"); < yes spare me the 1000x over details about how different this is> In the end I dont find namespaces a big deal. You either use them and learn them, or you dont and you dont. If your job is being forced to [expletive deleted] in XML that has namespaces then you learn how to use them. If not you blissfully ignore them. "Whads Da big F'n Deal". Writing good software takes work, there is no holy grail of "No Code Needed" or "No Brain Needed". -David
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|