XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - November, 2013

Play the video

Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Nov 2013 17:20:28 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 4 Nov 2013 14:10:01 -0000
Moving xml technology development outside of w3c, From Rand McRanderson <therandshow@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:35:14 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Moving xml technology development outside of w3c, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:15 -0000
Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:42 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 15:17:28 -0000
How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 22:15:50 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?, From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 7 Nov 2013 23:37:28 -0000
Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 10:31:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 8 Nov 2013 11:05:41 -0000
- Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 8 Nov 2013 11:14:32 -0000
- Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 8 Nov 2013 11:29:04 -0000
- Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Nov 2013 14:51:34 -0000
- Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 00:21:34 -0000
Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 19:04:27 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 8 Nov 2013 20:54:59 -0000
Best options for converting JSON to XML, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:26:32 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML, From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:58:45 -0000
- RE: Best options for converting JSON to XML, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 9 Nov 2013 17:26:15 -0000
Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier, difficultthings more difficult, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 12:36:55 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 13:47:28 -0000
- Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:31:30 -0000
- Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:41:57 -0000
- Re: Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 13 Nov 2013 11:55:36 -0000
Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 14:32:59 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:44:36 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:57:06 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 12 Nov 2013 15:00:22 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 15:46:42 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:18:05 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:30:08 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 12 Nov 2013 16:53:47 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:11:48 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:17:17 -0000
- Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:36:14 -0000
Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:06:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:55:43 -0000
RE: Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 14 Nov 2013 14:41:09 -0000
Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Nov 2013 12:53:24 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 13:05:13 -0000
[OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 13:35:00 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:00:05 -0000
Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:21:36 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:35:14 -0000
seduced by markup, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:59:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: seduced by markup, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:35:09 -0000
- Re: seduced by markup, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2013 04:49:16 -0000
XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Webbrowser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and infoarchitecture, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Nov 2013 10:32:47 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture, From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 16 Nov 2013 14:07:34 -0000
- Re: XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 05:15:21 -0000
Off-topic: Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from theXML experiment, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Nov 2013 09:14:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Off-topic: Re: [OT] Re: Lessonslearned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 16:27:23 -0000
What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessonslearned from the XML experiment, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:38:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:49:30 -0000
- Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:37:03 -0000
- Re: What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:45:07 -0000
What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 17:05:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:32:22 -0000
- RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:56:28 -0000
- RE: What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 18:23:18 -0000
- Re: What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 23:01:34 -0000
A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Nov 2013 18:25:14 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame, From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 22:45:51 -0000
How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enableefficient application processing?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 10:42:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?, From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 14:38:47 -0000
MicroXML APIs and MK Namespaces by Convention, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0000
Designing information for eternity, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 12:37:22 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Designing information for eternity, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Nov 2013 13:30:06 -0000
Re: Designing information for eternity, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 19 Nov 2013 13:54:10 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair, was Re: Designinginformation for eternity, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:42:07 -0000
Re: RE: Seduced by Markup, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 19 Nov 2013 15:43:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: RE: Seduced by Markup, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 19 Nov 2013 22:57:28 -0000
- Re: RE: Seduced by Markup, From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 00:29:07 -0000
Cognitive Dimensions of Notations, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 00:44:57 -0000
Cognitve Complexity: A Suggestion for Improving XML Designs, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 01:19:58 -0000
Seduced by markup, Take 2, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Nov 2013 16:43:36 -0000
How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Nov 2013 23:19:40 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  - Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 21 Nov 2013 02:27:45 -0000
- Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:46:27 -0000
if namespaces vanished, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:16:35 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: if namespaces vanished, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 00:22:53 -0000
- RE: if namespaces vanished, From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 22 Nov 2013 12:45:58 -0000
Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD,and namespaces?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Nov 2013 14:48:50 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:04:21 -0000
- Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:34:04 -0000
- Re: Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 04:17:18 -0000
Has Roger's Brain Been Altered?, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 22 Nov 2013 16:21:25 -0000
<org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 22 Nov 2013 19:42:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 11:21:14 -0000
- Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:08:46 -0000
The universality of "single starting point", From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Nov 2013 16:51:20 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The universality of "single starting point", From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:02:44 -0000
- Re: The universality of "single starting point", From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:33:38 -0000
- Re: The universality of "single starting point", From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:53:29 -0000
- Re: The universality of "single starting point", From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 23 Nov 2013 22:48:18 -0000
Binary versus Text, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Nov 2013 14:26:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Binary versus Text, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 15:40:36 -0000
- Re: Binary versus Text, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 16:01:29 -0000
- Re: Binary versus Text, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:24:30 -0000
- Re: Binary versus Text, From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:07:49 -0000
- Re: Binary versus Text, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 26 Nov 2013 14:38:03 -0000
XML as fall guy, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:39:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: XML as fall guy, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:37:20 -0000
- Re: XML as fall guy, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 21:03:39 -0000
- Re: XML as fall guy, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:01:36 -0000
Re: Binary versus Text, From Jeremy <jhgriffith@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:05:27 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: Binary versus Text, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:18:42 -0000
The pure essence of XML: these are the acceptable strings, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Nov 2013 11:51:12 -0000
OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:24:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:42:59 -0000
- Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?= <bansp@o2.pl> on 25 Nov 2013 14:51:49 -0000
- Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:34:58 -0000
- Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 25 Nov 2013 19:16:06 -0000
- Re: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 26 Nov 2013 01:29:46 -0000
OT++ RE: OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool forxmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:15:42 -0000
making of Lux, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:51:44 -0000
Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy, From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpslsolutions.com> on 27 Nov 2013 05:33:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Re: XML As Fall Guy, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 27 Nov 2013 08:12:18 -0000
- Re: XML As Fall Guy, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 17:19:45 -0000
Re: How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 27 Nov 2013 15:51:37 -0000
In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property mustbe preserved: semantics, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 15:10:13 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics, From gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com on 29 Nov 2013 15:30:04 -0000
- Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, thisproperty must be preserved: semantics, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 29 Nov 2013 17:03:10 -0000
- Re: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Nov 2013 18:15:29 -0000
- RE: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this propertymust be preserved: semantics, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 19:18:07 -0000
ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2013 18:04:01 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 20:03:42 -0000

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.14

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >