[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment

  • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:11:54 +0000

Re:  [OT] Re:  Lessons learned from the XML experiment
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote:
> On 11/16/13 9:05 AM, David Sheets wrote:
>>>
>>> "Refute" was the wrong choice of words, then.  "Refute" usually asks for
>>> a
>>> strong demolition, not just a glancing blow.  That was why I made the
>>> same
>>> complaint John just did.
>>
>>
>> If I make an assertion and you respond with "Absolutely not", I expect
>> you to muster a refutation. If you say "Why do you make this claim?",
>> I am more than happy to lay out my argument.
>
>
> Uche did ask such a thing, with "After you."  It did not appear to go over
> well.
>
> In any case, asking for refutation sounds more like a dare than a request
> for clarification.
>
>
>>> I think you meant to say "Can element omission be used to model optional
>>> [data structures]".
>>>
>>> "Can", of course.  Well, sort of.  The interesting question isn't "can",
>>> but
>>> "is it a good idea?".  There's no general answer to that - it all depends
>>> on
>>> what you want to do and in what context.
>>
>>
>> Is it a better idea than using the string "null"? Other solutions
>> include special attributes or a distinct element. Are there still more
>> that are simple to express in XML the Syntax?
>>
>> Does XML lack something that would make using the command string
>> "null" preferable to one of these other options in some context?
>
>
> Is this a Zen koan exercise?  There is no general answer.  The only answers
> exist in specific contexts people create.

And so, we learn nothing about how the design of XML does or does not
influence bad data design.

> Thanks,
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> http://simonstl.com/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.