Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable
 On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> wrote: --
Attributes, I take it.
If your namespaces are sane, then QiC aren't a special problem. I also think that "healthy neurotic" documents, which don't use prefixes and just change the default namespaces as needed, are a reasonable second to sane documents. They don't allow arbitrary movement, and they don't work if multiple namespaces are used in scattered ways, but if they are used primarily at document component boundaries, they are tolerable. If the MicroXML CG hadn't decided to eliminate namespaces altogether, I could easily have lived with this style. Liam's automatic namespaces fit with this style.
Not to be confused with Jams O'Donnell notation. GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures 
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
