[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Less

• From: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 06:34:37 -0200

Hi Simon,

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote:
>
> My interest in markup is not purely technological, but rather about markup's
> being an almost unique intersection of humans and computers. Markup is a set
> of tools that lets humans gets directly in the information flow.  Computers
> are certainly still involved, but their role is minimized to the extent
> possible.

I think I understand your perspective.  Except, possibly what you
intend to mean regarding 'information flow'.  Am I correct in that
this is in regards from one person to another person via computerized
text?

So, if I am correct in seeing your perspective that the purpose of XML
(in your perspective) is to delineate (markup?) textual content into
sections?  Also, that XML in its current and probable future state can
do this for you in the way that you choose to use it?

Can you *PLEASE* tell me how the fact that XML has other components
that addresses other uses cases outside your own use case, harms you
or your work in any way?

IOW: If you are not forced to use XSD or namespaces to accomplish your
goals with XML.  Why are yo u so adamantly against them when they are
useful to other people in different use cases.

I have asked questions on this list about XML technologies that are
specified and are in common use across domains.  Hoping to get answers
from people with more experience in XML.  Like you, I know my domain.
I can make the decision whether or not XML technologies are a good
fit, if I can get technological NOT philosophical answers.

Thank you,
Tim




-- 
MLHIM VIP Signup: http://goo.gl/22B0U
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Like Us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/mlhim2
Circle us on G+: http://goo.gl/44EV5
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

• References:
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de>
  • "The syntax view" was Re: [OT] Re: Lessons learnedfrom the XML experiment
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>