XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2008

• Are documents loosing the web?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 1 Feb 2008 08:51:52 -0000
• Benefits of validation, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 1 Feb 2008 11:20:49 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Benefits of validation, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 1 Feb 2008 12:45:43 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Benefits of validation, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 1 Feb 2008 14:43:44 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Benefits of validation, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 1 Feb 2008 15:24:21 -0000
  • Re: Benefits of validation, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 7 Feb 2008 16:02:52 -0000
• RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 1 Feb 2008 14:00:17 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 1 Feb 2008 14:11:42 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 1 Feb 2008 14:49:58 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 1 Feb 2008 15:07:49 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Leendert Poot <lpoot@c...> on 1 Feb 2008 15:14:00 -0000
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 1 Feb 2008 15:31:01 -0000
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 1 Feb 2008 15:26:18 -0000
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 1 Feb 2008 18:42:24 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 19 Feb 2008 22:10:12 -0000
  • RE: Are documents loosing the web?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 19 Feb 2008 22:15:27 -0000
• RE:[SUMMARY] XPath 2.0 Best Practice Issue: Graceful Degradation, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 1 Feb 2008 16:51:21 -0000
• EditiX XML Editor - 2008 RC1, From "Alexandre Brillant" <abrillant@j...> on 1 Feb 2008 18:19:07 -0000
• RE: can MSV accept more than one schema files at once, From Zhenyu Dai <zhedai@e...> on 1 Feb 2008 18:21:38 -0000
• [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 3 Feb 2008 16:33:25 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 3 Feb 2008 17:23:01 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 4 Feb 2008 03:58:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> on 4 Feb 2008 04:17:51 -0000
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 4 Feb 2008 04:30:43 -0000
  • RE: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Feb 2008 07:54:00 -0000
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 4 Feb 2008 08:51:13 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 5 Feb 2008 09:32:28 -0000
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery, From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 19:19:12 -0000
  • The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 21:46:29 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 23:46:54 -0000
  • Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:57 -0000
  • RE: Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Feb 2008 13:47:34 -0000
  • The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 7 Feb 2008 00:19:09 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Feb 2008 09:56:23 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Feb 2008 00:38:39 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 8 Feb 2008 13:11:16 -0000
  • Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:45 -0000
  • Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:55:28 -0000
  • Re: Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 6 Feb 2008 23:54:00 -0000
  • [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 7 Feb 2008 08:43:37 -0000
  • Re: [distribution] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:34 -0000
  • Message not available
  • [distribution] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 7 Feb 2008 08:43:16 -0000
  • Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:47 -0000
  • Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery, From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 7 Feb 2008 22:54:47 -0000
  • Re: Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 8 Feb 2008 13:20:57 -0000
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 11 Feb 2008 07:45:28 -0000
  • RE: Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main], From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 09:26:46 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 11 Feb 2008 12:54:16 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 17:52:28 -0000
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:47 -0000
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Feb 2008 08:32:07 -0000
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:39 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:36 -0000
  • Message not available
  • [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 7 Feb 2008 09:38:35 -0000
  • Message not available
  • [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 7 Feb 2008 10:12:57 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 11 Feb 2008 06:04:52 -0000
  • Message not available
  • SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 11 Feb 2008 12:54:02 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:46 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:47 -0000
  • Message not available
  • [personal], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 7 Feb 2008 09:12:33 -0000
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 5 Feb 2008 18:24:56 -0000
• [ann: debugxslt v.0.1]: a very experimental xslt lint checker using latest schematron, From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 3 Feb 2008 16:48:36 -0000
• Press Release - CECID Contributed OSB Service Bus to CECID CommunityWebsite, From Patrick Yee <kcyee@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 03:09:17 -0000
• Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0, From "Marshall, Steven (SKM)" <SMarshall@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 04:39:22 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], From Nicholas.Ardlie@i... on 5 Feb 2008 05:03:04 -0000
  • RE: Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 12:05:17 -0000
  • Re: Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 7 Feb 2008 18:40:36 -0000
• xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?, From XGuy <ilangocal@y...> on 5 Feb 2008 17:30:35 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 18:08:48 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?, From XGuy <ilangocal@y...> on 5 Feb 2008 18:22:35 -0000
  • RE: xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?, From XGuy <ilangocal@y...> on 5 Feb 2008 19:09:45 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:56:29 -0000
  • Re: xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 18:22:59 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?, From XGuy <ilangocal@y...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:32:10 -0000
• Re: xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:04:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  Followups by subject
  
  • Re: xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:24:39 -0000
• [ANN] Metalink (XML for describing downloads: mirrors, checksums, etc), From "Anthony Bryan" <anthonybryan@g...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:17:07 -0000
• re ferencing an already declared element in the schema(nota global element), From XGuy <ilangocal@y...> on 5 Feb 2008 20:44:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: re ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element), From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 5 Feb 2008 22:08:13 -0000
  • RE: re ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Feb 2008 22:18:00 -0000
• Call for Papers: XIME-P 2008, From Carl-Christian Kanne <cckanne@g...> on 6 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0000
• Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron, From "Zhiwu Xie" <zxie.lists@g...> on 6 Feb 2008 21:48:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility- XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron, From Zhiwu Xie <zxie.lists@g...> on 7 Feb 2008 01:56:27 -0000
• XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards, From Dan Vint <dvint@d...> on 7 Feb 2008 01:36:51 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 7 Feb 2008 07:50:01 -0000
• Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type, From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F...> on 7 Feb 2008 12:19:14 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Feb 2008 15:12:19 -0000
• Applying enumeration-facet on list type, From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F...> on 7 Feb 2008 12:54:30 -0000
• [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 3.1.0 released, From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 7 Feb 2008 14:08:16 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From mike@a... on 7 Feb 2008 18:49:29 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 7 Feb 2008 21:42:51 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Feb 2008 22:54:25 -0000
• RE: Benefits of validation, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 7 Feb 2008 18:55:57 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From mike@a... on 7 Feb 2008 23:39:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Xia Li" <xli@g...> on 8 Feb 2008 01:14:52 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 8 Feb 2008 01:32:34 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 8 Feb 2008 13:07:28 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 8 Feb 2008 14:22:12 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 8 Feb 2008 16:22:00 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 8 Feb 2008 17:59:28 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 8 Feb 2008 19:02:26 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 8 Feb 2008 20:32:18 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Feb 2008 19:36:28 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 06:52:39 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From mike@a... on 8 Feb 2008 02:38:25 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Feb 2008 10:09:48 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Xia Li" <xli@g...> on 8 Feb 2008 18:53:42 -0000
• Word processors and semantic content, From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@x...> on 8 Feb 2008 12:48:28 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Word processors and semantic content, From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...> on 11 Feb 2008 17:41:44 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 11 Feb 2008 18:09:32 -0000
  • Word processors and semantic content, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 00:13:05 -0000
  • RE: Word processors and semantic content, From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@x...> on 15 Feb 2008 17:27:17 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Feb 2008 18:25:57 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From mike@a... on 8 Feb 2008 20:46:32 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 8 Feb 2008 22:35:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Feb 2008 23:58:17 -0000
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 9 Feb 2008 00:27:54 -0000
• RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 8 Feb 2008 21:15:32 -0000
• Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 10 Feb 2008 14:59:05 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents bySearchbots, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 10 Feb 2008 15:19:21 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots, From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 10 Feb 2008 15:34:33 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots, From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 10 Feb 2008 18:03:42 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From mike@a... on 10 Feb 2008 23:00:26 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 09:14:31 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 11 Feb 2008 11:45:10 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 11 Feb 2008 12:52:10 -0000
  • The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 17:09:48 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 11 Feb 2008 17:46:46 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 11:07:03 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From mike@a... on 12 Feb 2008 09:10:40 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 11:32:06 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 12:13:53 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From mike@a... on 13 Feb 2008 19:37:22 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 15 Feb 2008 12:04:20 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From mike@a... on 13 Feb 2008 20:20:57 -0000
  • Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From mike@a... on 15 Feb 2008 21:28:48 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Feb 2008 22:53:23 -0000
• XPath search problem, From "Marshall, Steven (SKM)" <SMarshall@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 08:46:56 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XPath search problem, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 09:53:24 -0000
  • RE: XPath search problem, From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@x...> on 11 Feb 2008 09:57:18 -0000
• XPath(ish) in the browser, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 11 Feb 2008 14:52:54 -0000
• LinkedData Planet call for speakers closes February 15, 2008, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 17:33:44 -0000
• RE: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 18:46:02 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@x...> on 15 Feb 2008 17:29:47 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 15 Feb 2008 18:44:00 -0000
  • RE: RE: Word processors and semantic content, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 15 Feb 2008 20:21:05 -0000
• RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 18:52:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 20:22:19 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:45 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 12:56:58 -0000
  • [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 13:51:30 -0000
  • RE: [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 15:41:40 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:33 -0000
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Feb 2008 10:19:02 -0000
  • [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 13 Feb 2008 14:40:01 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 13:51:43 -0000
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 12 Feb 2008 16:47:03 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:25:44 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:44 -0000
  • [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:41 -0000
  • Re: [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 14 Feb 2008 02:26:12 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 14 Feb 2008 07:20:34 -0000
  • Message not available
  • [main] SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 15 Feb 2008 10:29:26 -0000
  • Message not available
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 15 Feb 2008 12:06:55 -0000
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 22:10:36 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:46 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:01:22 -0000
  • SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:27 -0000
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:46 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 20:36:52 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 11 Feb 2008 22:53:50 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:50 -0000
  • Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:33 -0000
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 22:42:49 -0000
  • RE: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:10:48 -0000
• ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 21:38:32 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 12 Feb 2008 07:28:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:10:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:49:36 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:12:46 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 11:19:07 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 12:56:40 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 12 Feb 2008 14:43:55 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 14:52:43 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 12 Feb 2008 16:36:44 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:04:27 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:43:32 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 18:44:05 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:55:13 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:36:44 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:23:26 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:36:32 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:00:11 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 19 Feb 2008 19:22:37 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 16:01:59 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@g...> on 20 Feb 2008 16:40:11 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 21 Feb 2008 15:39:51 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 21 Feb 2008 23:36:05 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 21 Feb 2008 03:35:27 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 21 Feb 2008 04:38:43 -0000
  • xml:type (Was: Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?), From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 21 Feb 2008 09:48:47 -0000
  • Re: xml:type (Was: Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 11:41:49 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 21 Feb 2008 21:41:22 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:51:23 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 12 Feb 2008 19:31:54 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:40:00 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:48:53 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:57:06 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 15 Feb 2008 00:30:23 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 15 Feb 2008 05:48:31 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 15 Feb 2008 09:35:26 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:44:12 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> on 15 Feb 2008 10:44:00 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 02:48:20 -0000
• RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 22:38:05 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 11 Feb 2008 22:50:27 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 11 Feb 2008 23:52:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 02:16:42 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 12 Feb 2008 03:07:16 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 03:12:08 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 12 Feb 2008 03:20:48 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 10:03:59 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 11:27:09 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 12 Feb 2008 12:32:21 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:28:48 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 17:40:05 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 13 Feb 2008 09:42:33 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Feb 2008 10:12:00 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 14 Feb 2008 17:35:56 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Philip Fearon" <pgfearo@g...> on 14 Feb 2008 22:55:26 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 15 Feb 2008 11:54:07 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 15 Feb 2008 15:47:40 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 16 Feb 2008 03:35:28 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Feb 2008 23:03:25 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Daniel L. Koger" <daniel.koger@g...> on 11 Feb 2008 23:51:34 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 02:13:58 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 12 Feb 2008 13:27:03 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...> on 12 Feb 2008 13:49:46 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 15:22:55 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...> on 12 Feb 2008 15:54:54 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 12 Feb 2008 16:53:08 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> on 12 Feb 2008 18:06:02 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 12 Feb 2008 18:12:56 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Feb 2008 16:33:29 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:35:47 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 22 Feb 2008 06:33:09 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:31:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:04:59 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:30:13 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 18 Feb 2008 22:51:46 -0000
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 19 Feb 2008 19:31:41 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 19 Feb 2008 19:59:20 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Feb 2008 08:54:16 -0000
  • RE: ten years later, time to repeat it?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 22 Feb 2008 14:11:33 -0000
• Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 20:50:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announcesMicrosoft commitment to declarative programming, From Robin Cover <robin@o...> on 12 Feb 2008 21:39:26 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Feb 2008 23:34:59 -0000
• W3C XML is Ten Years Old, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 14 Feb 2008 00:50:01 -0000
• ANN: Best Practices for XML Internationalization, From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w...> on 14 Feb 2008 05:53:48 -0000
• SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic], From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 15 Feb 2008 11:08:27 -0000
• Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 15 Feb 2008 16:06:08 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 02:52:16 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 16 Feb 2008 09:13:08 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:31:41 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 20 Feb 2008 17:08:43 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 21 Feb 2008 16:04:45 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 21 Feb 2008 16:25:53 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 17:37:19 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 21 Feb 2008 18:03:08 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 17:43:25 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 03:00:41 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 16 Feb 2008 03:57:30 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Feb 2008 08:50:53 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 16 Feb 2008 13:24:33 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@o...> on 18 Feb 2008 05:13:13 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 11:25:10 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@o...> on 18 Feb 2008 14:57:43 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:09:58 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Kevin S. Clarke" <ksclarke@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:26:57 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:49:05 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Kevin S. Clarke" <ksclarke@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:05:07 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 18:00:34 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 22:52:33 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 19 Feb 2008 03:48:35 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:36:43 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 18:18:21 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:13:01 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:24:57 -0000
  • XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@o...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:33:43 -0000
  • Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 19 Feb 2008 03:43:45 -0000
  • Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 23 Feb 2008 04:52:41 -0000
  • Re: Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 23 Feb 2008 05:30:44 -0000
  • RE: Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 09:50:01 -0000
  • Re: Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...> on 24 Feb 2008 00:35:54 -0000
  • Re: Re: XML element names, From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 24 Feb 2008 15:12:24 -0000
  • Re: Re: XML element names, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 24 Feb 2008 17:10:33 -0000
  • RE: Re: XML element names, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 24 Feb 2008 19:10:43 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 16 Feb 2008 18:48:50 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 16 Feb 2008 15:30:42 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 17:30:53 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Feb 2008 18:15:59 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 21:46:11 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 17 Feb 2008 00:19:44 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 17 Feb 2008 11:00:56 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 18 Feb 2008 00:42:56 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 14:55:29 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:59:29 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:27:16 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:37:16 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:25:07 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 23:25:50 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 19:52:26 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 00:11:48 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 22 Feb 2008 10:29:34 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 12:03:30 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 22 Feb 2008 12:27:08 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 16:54:47 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 22 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0000
  • Working with Unicode files (was Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From Dan Vint <dvint@d...> on 22 Feb 2008 18:16:28 -0000
  • RE: Working with Unicode files (was Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?), From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 18:31:30 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 14:09:00 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:56:24 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:45:37 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:44:06 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 20:02:10 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 21 Feb 2008 20:14:30 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 17 Feb 2008 16:28:55 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...> on 18 Feb 2008 03:03:45 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:28:41 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 19 Feb 2008 01:02:07 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 19 Feb 2008 04:05:16 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 19 Feb 2008 09:09:07 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 16:04:31 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 14:59:40 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 15:55:49 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@M...> on 18 Feb 2008 16:55:25 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:16:29 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 18:56:14 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:25:06 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:38:25 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 20:33:49 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 19 Feb 2008 10:21:52 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 19 Feb 2008 16:00:13 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 20 Feb 2008 17:37:44 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 20 Feb 2008 18:30:57 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 22 Feb 2008 05:59:24 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 09:42:03 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 10:01:53 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 22 Feb 2008 10:53:44 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 22 Feb 2008 16:45:38 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 22 Feb 2008 17:24:58 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 20:03:46 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:03:09 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:00:06 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:19:23 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 20:04:14 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Feb 2008 15:30:08 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:09:45 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Robin Berjon <robin@j...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:33:05 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w...> on 20 Feb 2008 23:28:23 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:34 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w...> on 21 Feb 2008 23:33:44 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:37 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:40 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 21 Feb 2008 19:57:53 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Stephen-NHDS <sbeller@n...> on 23 Feb 2008 16:40:28 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 23 Feb 2008 23:48:02 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Stephen Beller <sbeller@n...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:03:30 -0000
  • Resolving XML's Unicode Incompatibility Problem Using"Positional Tagging", From Stephen Beller <sbeller@n...> on 26 Feb 2008 16:59:25 -0000
• RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 15 Feb 2008 17:10:33 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 16 Feb 2008 14:09:27 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 19 Feb 2008 22:59:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 20 Feb 2008 02:10:41 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 20 Feb 2008 03:28:52 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 20 Feb 2008 04:02:28 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 18 Feb 2008 17:40:18 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 18 Feb 2008 19:13:44 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 18 Feb 2008 20:10:25 -0000
  • Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 21 Feb 2008 14:16:16 -0000
  • RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?, From "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w...> on 22 Feb 2008 21:27:18 -0000
• Re: The limitations of XPath and navigation- Recursive Processing, From mike@a... on 16 Feb 2008 19:57:40 -0000
• Several external entities in an XML, From "Jonathan Ceballos Rodriguez" <jceballosrodriguez@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 11:00:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Several external entities in an XML, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 11:43:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Several external entities in an XML, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Feb 2008 12:21:09 -0000
  • Re: Several external entities in an XML, From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@g...> on 18 Feb 2008 12:08:15 -0000
• XML Grammar [EBNF], From "netbeans.javame.user" <netbeans.javame.user@g...> on 19 Feb 2008 19:56:41 -0000
• javascript to acces xsl:sort, From "S.Kannan" <techy_kans@y...> on 20 Feb 2008 06:56:26 -0000
• CSS instead of Namespace, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 07:47:10 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> on 20 Feb 2008 09:26:53 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:08:40 -0000
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@g...> on 20 Feb 2008 10:52:07 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 20 Feb 2008 13:14:59 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:19:31 -0000
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:33:00 -0000
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:15:35 -0000
  • Re: CSS instead of Namespace, From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w...> on 21 Feb 2008 01:38:49 -0000
  • Re[2]: CSS instead of Namespace, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 21 Feb 2008 07:17:39 -0000
  • Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 13:42:49 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSSinstead of Namespace), From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 20 Feb 2008 13:52:37 -0000
  • Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:08:58 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was:CSS instead of Namespace), From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:51:46 -0000
  • Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 21 Feb 2008 07:57:28 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 10:57:04 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was:CSS instead of Namespace), From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 21 Feb 2008 13:27:32 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 15:17:40 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 19:14:38 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 19:46:43 -0000
  • Re: Re[2]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 20:32:49 -0000
  • Re[4]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 22 Feb 2008 07:11:56 -0000
  • RE: Re[4]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 10:14:50 -0000
  • [offtopic] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 22 Feb 2008 10:59:54 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re[6]: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 25 Feb 2008 08:55:07 -0000
  • [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 14:30:47 -0000
  • [2] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 20 Feb 2008 15:49:08 -0000
  • [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 21 Feb 2008 07:17:39 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 10:09:06 -0000
  • [main] Namespace: file with rules instead of tag's prefix (was: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)}, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 21 Feb 2008 11:45:04 -0000
• XML 2.0, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 20 Feb 2008 17:07:01 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML 2.0, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 20 Feb 2008 18:55:01 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML 2.0, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 21 Feb 2008 04:46:54 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML 2.0, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 22 Feb 2008 07:12:50 -0000
• RE: XML 2.0, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 20 Feb 2008 18:59:51 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  Followups by subject
  
  • Re: XML 2.0, From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...> on 23 Feb 2008 08:36:53 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 10:05:28 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML 2.0, From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...> on 23 Feb 2008 10:17:59 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 24 Feb 2008 18:43:24 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 24 Feb 2008 19:31:19 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 24 Feb 2008 20:50:17 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 24 Feb 2008 23:57:53 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 24 Feb 2008 23:05:58 -0000
  • RE: XML 2.0, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 24 Feb 2008 23:59:56 -0000
  • Re: XML 2.0, From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...> on 25 Feb 2008 08:00:08 -0000
  • Re: XML 2.0, From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:26:31 -0000
  • Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 26 Feb 2008 01:43:08 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents, From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...> on 26 Feb 2008 07:32:37 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Feb 2008 21:19:58 -0000
  • Message not available
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Feb 2008 21:56:01 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 26 Feb 2008 22:14:14 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 27 Feb 2008 00:38:13 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Feb 2008 09:15:01 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 27 Feb 2008 09:38:53 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 27 Feb 2008 13:42:15 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Feb 2008 14:06:49 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...> on 27 Feb 2008 14:55:31 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 27 Feb 2008 18:09:32 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Feb 2008 18:22:32 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 27 Feb 2008 18:41:14 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 28 Feb 2008 15:02:01 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Feb 2008 10:37:28 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 28 Feb 2008 21:33:15 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 12:57:17 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 29 Feb 2008 14:54:15 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 19:28:59 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 29 Feb 2008 20:09:11 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 29 Feb 2008 20:33:55 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 29 Feb 2008 16:28:44 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 27 Feb 2008 19:32:05 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Feb 2008 21:44:01 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 28 Feb 2008 02:33:34 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Feb 2008 09:18:22 -0000
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...> on 28 Feb 2008 13:38:00 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0), From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 10:22:21 -0000
  • Re: Nested Documents, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 29 Feb 2008 09:01:31 -0000
  • Re: XML 2.0, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 15:51:06 -0000
  • Re: XML 2.0, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 09:41:31 -0000
• file with rules instead of tag's prefix, From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...> on 21 Feb 2008 12:42:38 -0000
• RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 22 Feb 2008 22:32:46 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Jim Ancona <jim@a...> on 23 Feb 2008 06:15:25 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 14:02:08 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 23 Feb 2008 14:54:08 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 15:43:21 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Jim Ancona <jim@a...> on 23 Feb 2008 16:57:23 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 17:54:23 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 24 Feb 2008 18:49:47 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 11:05:04 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 18:45:07 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 24 Feb 2008 09:48:51 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "\"John L. Clark\"" <jlc6@p...> on 26 Feb 2008 01:32:12 -0000
• RE: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 22 Feb 2008 22:52:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@g...> on 23 Feb 2008 01:35:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 23 Feb 2008 03:30:21 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 23 Feb 2008 04:36:45 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 10:45:34 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 11:10:43 -0000
  • Message not available
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 26 Feb 2008 11:56:28 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 25 Feb 2008 13:38:49 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 25 Feb 2008 13:53:27 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:02:05 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:06:47 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:12:09 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:55:56 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:48:23 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:51:24 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 15:41:51 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "\"John L. Clark\"" <jlc6@p...> on 26 Feb 2008 01:30:24 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 25 Feb 2008 14:54:11 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 26 Feb 2008 13:09:47 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: [SPAM] Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@a...> on 26 Feb 2008 16:27:34 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [SPAM] Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 26 Feb 2008 16:41:48 -0000
  • RE: [SPAM] Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@a...> on 26 Feb 2008 17:11:04 -0000
  • Re: [SPAM] Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> on 26 Feb 2008 17:07:50 -0000
  • Re: Re: [SPAM] Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 26 Feb 2008 19:34:44 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 26 Feb 2008 19:47:36 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 26 Feb 2008 22:55:03 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 08:24:13 -0000
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments', From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 27 Feb 2008 01:29:37 -0000
  • persisting java object model.., From dave <ceek63@y...> on 27 Feb 2008 19:55:59 -0000
  • Re: persisting java object model.., From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 20:29:52 -0000
  • Re: persisting java object model.., From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 21:35:32 -0000
  • Re: persisting java object model.., From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 22:23:59 -0000
• Optimizing XML performance, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 24 Feb 2008 14:46:58 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Optimizing XML performance, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 25 Feb 2008 17:55:33 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Optimizing XML performance, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 26 Feb 2008 14:20:04 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Message not available
  • Re: Optimizing XML performance, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 06:37:06 -0000
• XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams, From Rob Cameron <cameron@c...> on 25 Feb 2008 12:57:34 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel BitStreams, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 25 Feb 2008 17:25:08 -0000
  • Re: XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams, From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 26 Feb 2008 01:43:13 -0000
• Re: XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams, From Rob Cameron <cameron@c...> on 25 Feb 2008 18:53:07 -0000
• IDtrust 2008 Program Complete--Last Chance to Register!!, From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 26 Feb 2008 15:36:12 -0000
• Accept-Charset and XML declaration?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 11:18:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Accept-Charset and XML declaration?, From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...> on 27 Feb 2008 12:22:42 -0000
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: Accept-Charset and XML declaration?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 12:28:56 -0000
    Followups by message-id references
    
    • Re: Accept-Charset and XML declaration?, From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> on 27 Feb 2008 14:14:46 -0000
• XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F...> on 27 Feb 2008 17:05:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 27 Feb 2008 17:41:26 -0000
  • Re: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 27 Feb 2008 17:56:49 -0000
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Feb 2008 19:52:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...> on 28 Feb 2008 14:38:59 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 28 Feb 2008 14:47:36 -0000
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Feb 2008 15:01:43 -0000
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 28 Feb 2008 22:07:04 -0000
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 11:32:47 -0000
  • Message not available
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 15:04:30 -0000
  • Message not available
  • RE: XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 16:46:43 -0000
• xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?, From dave <ceek63@y...> on 28 Feb 2008 00:57:52 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Feb 2008 08:37:58 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?, From dave <ceek63@y...> on 28 Feb 2008 19:01:23 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Feb 2008 21:33:17 -0000
• Email Validation with Regular Expression, From "Benjamin Azan" <ben.azan@g...> on 28 Feb 2008 19:37:37 -0000
• Press Release - CECID Contributed Self-Service Hermes Messaging Gatewayv2.0 (H2O) Testing Server for Free, From Patrick Yee <kcyee@c...> on 29 Feb 2008 09:35:29 -0000
• OASIS XACML InterOp Demo, RSA 2008, San Francisco, California, USA, April 7-11 2008, From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 29 Feb 2008 18:14:14 -0000
• Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements, From "Robert Hall" <rhall@t...> on 29 Feb 2008 18:51:58 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Feb 2008 19:31:33 -0000