[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)

• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Rick Jelliffe'" <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:55:49 -0000

[Going back on list]

> 
> No-one has still yet told me how they reliably know that a 
> document has ended correctly in the multi-root scenario.
> 

If you want to defend yourself against unreliability in the transport layer
and below, you could (a) use a more reliable transport layer, or (b) add a
checksum or signature. 

XML has plenty of redundancy and this does have the virtue that many file
corruptions will be detected automatically. But I don't think that argument
is strong enough to justify this inconvenience. Besides, you could apply it
just as much to external entities, which don't currently have this
restriction (and I don't see the world catching fire because external
entities are being corrupted all over the place).

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• References:
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>