[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML 2.0

• From: "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...>
• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:26:22 +0100

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> >
>  > Yes, but how do you ever know the document is complete and
>  > not truncated?
>  >
>
>  My log file never is complete. That doesn't stop me wanting to read it.
>
I agree with that: we are allowed infinitely long names (which does
not seem so useful to me, unless you want to exploit security
breaches), but we lack the concept of infinitely long documents (which
could be of a much wider application).

Regards,

Eric Bréchemier

• References:
  • Re: XML 2.0
    • From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: XML 2.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>