• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:11:58 -0500

Robert Koberg wrote:
> just quibbling, but 'updater' is a noun. It can be used with any of the
> verbs.

Yes, you're quibbling.

I'm not sure what the point of using an update verb (POST) on an updater 
URL would be, or what the result of any other HTTP request to it would 
be.  DELETE to an 'updater' URL?  GET?  PUT?

It can't actually be used with the available verbs in this case.

Thanks,
Simon St.Laurent
Retired XML Troublemaker
http://simonstl.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• References:
  • RE: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@g...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: RESTful operations on document fragments
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>