- From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
- To: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:55:11 +0100
I don't understand what you mean by "more tightly linked"...
Having multiple roots is almost as having multiple documents, one after
another, in a single message or in a single file... ?!?
I have seen plenty of examples of XML documents which are nothing but a
collection of sub-documents and, in these cases, the root is
meaningless, just there to have a valid XML document. When you convert
a CSV file to an XML document, you have to create a root element, let's
say 'Records', without attributes, and as many 'Record' elements as
lines in the CSV file. I think 'Records' is useless...
Alain COUTHURES
<agenceXML>
http://www.agencexml.com
Richard Salz a écrit :
OFF44E5DC7.D08375D2-ON852573FC.004B1219-852573FC.004B4227@u..."
type="cite">
You didn't respond to what I thought
was the more interesting point: multiple roots result in producer,
intermediary,
and consumer being more tightly linked. Yes, as someone pointed out,
you have the issue of trailing comments and PI's, but I'll do a
hand-wave
and say those are not common. And I admit I'm trying to brush off
something I find inconvenient. :)
/r$
--
STSM, DataPower Chief Programmer
WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/datapower/
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
