• From: Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:38:32 +0200

bryan,

>> Usage of XQuery for processing of xml-data in DBMS
>> is practically equal to existence of second, foreign query language.
br> You don't actually make an argument why a second query language
br> (foreign or not) is a bad thing.

Existance of two languages means breakup continuity,
presence of gap between two technologies.
It require additional job/time/finance
at supporting two technologies in one company/project,
at carrying data from rational engine to xml-engine
(when data becomes less ordered, structurized and
more chaotic).
It's convenient to have only one technology.


Dmitry Turin
HTML6     (6. 5.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
SQL5      (5.11.0)  http://sql50.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7. 2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2. 0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru

• References:
  • [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • SQL instead of XQuery
    • From: Dmitry Turin <dev3os@n...>
  • Re: SQL instead of XQuery
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>