[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yes, But I am not a fan of the information XML Schema places in, nor really XML Schema in the whole. Cheers, Bryan Rasmiussen On Feb 20, 2008 3:19 PM, Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...> wrote: > bryan rasmussen wrote: > > the reason why it is bad is obvious, CSS is useful for slotting in and > > out what is inessential to understanding of the data, mainly the > > presentation, while namespaces (as currently defined) are an essential > > part of understanding what the data is. > > The general notion of using an external document to provide information > on how to process an XML document is hardly new, though. > > See, for one old example: > > http://www.simonstl.com/projects/xpdl/ > > The SGML Prolog is of course even more ancient. > > The idea is still appealing to me - but at the same time seems ever less > likely to catch on generally. It's kind of funny, though, given that > W3C XML Schemas may in some instances provide much more information > necessary to 'properly' interpret a document, "an essential part of > understanding what the data is." > > Layering on top, sure - layering below, consternation. > > Thanks, > Simon St.Laurent > Retiring XML troublemaker > http://simonstl.com/ > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



