[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Feb 11, 2008 12:43 PM, John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> wrote: > I agree. Like Michael, I'm an XQuery implementer and like to think I > have a reasonable understanding of the technology space, but I'm also > having a hard time following the opaque terminology you use. > > You clearly feel that you have an important message for the XML / XQuery > community, and I'm willing to put some effort into understanding what > you're trying to say. What I need is a clear explanation or terms like > "LCA", "non-linear", "multi-leg" etc. I could so with some examples > written in XML to illustrate them, and an example of a problem that > demonstrates the advantages of your query techniques. > > I'm not dismissing what you have to say, but I don't exactly get users > come up to me every day asking when they're going to be able to join two > non-linear multi-leg structures in XQuery. What's the value proposition > for XQuery users? well said John, I have to admit being baffled by some of the terms in this discussion .... though it smells like a 'perma thread' (sql is better then [xml|xpath|xquery|xslt] I reread things just to make sure I wasn't going mad; I think that we will find once we have a reference example that the problem will boil down to 'can XPATH do it in 1 pass or 1+n steps' versus sql can do it in 1 step. my 2p, cheers, Jim Fuller
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



