• From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:45:23 +0100

Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
>>  
>> In 2002, I proposed XML-SW (http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html) 
>> which retains namespaces but discards DTD's (thus entities and 
>> notations and so on) and the <!DOCTYPE>, also rolling in the 
>> Information Set and xml:base.   I still think it's a good idea.
> +1 (except I'd like for all the W3C and math special character entities 
> to be built-in: too many people like them and XHTML uses them)

+1
(And entities are not used only by XHTML but also by DocBook and MathML, 
for example.)

				Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@k...      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
        Professional XML consulting and training services
   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

OpenPGP digital signature

• References:
  • ten years later, time to repeat it?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>