• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Johnson, Matthew C. \(LNG-ALB\)'" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:28:35 -0000

> I like the idea of the 
> processing instruction.  Although it seems that it should be 
> a standardized one (e.g. <?xml:docclosed ...?>) that all 
> parsers can look for. 

I'm afraid I find this all completely bizarre. I thought the days when you
put "****" at the end of a data file because you couldn't rely on the I/O
system reporting that you'd hit the end of your reel of paper tape were gone
about 40 years ago.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...>

• References:
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
    • From: "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@l...>