|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - August, 2003
- Native XML databases,
sridhar dongara
- [ANN] xmloperator 2.3,
didier demany
- RE: Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations?,
Klotz, Leigh
- Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations?,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: Linking xml files together,
DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
- Re: Mixed Content,
Jason Diamond
- RE: Question about UTF-8,
Rob McDougall
- RE: [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XSLT and default namespaces,
Paul Spencer
- [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead?,
AndrewWatt2000
- XML storage,
Helena
- Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev,
G. Ken Holman
- freeware command line toolkit for XML,
Mikhail Grushinskiy
- Linking xml files together,
Cams Ismael
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Question about UTF-8,
Gustaf Liljegren
- XML mapping to java objects,
Kunal J
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: XML and the Relational Model [long],
Jeff Lowery
- RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy),
Laurent.SABARTHEZ
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: XML.Net find node by content and change attribute,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Need help on JAXB!,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Namespace declaration and schema validation problems,
Dare Obasanjo
- The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs?,
Mike Champion
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: xml taxonomy,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xml taxonomy,
Rick Marshall
- Namespace declaration and schema validation problems,
Noelle
- Final CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003,
akmal chaudhri
- Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III,
Winchel \"Todd\" Vincent III
- XML.Net find node by content and change attribute,
Mattison
- Mondial: The CIA World Factbook in Oracle, XML, F-Logic, and Datalog,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: XPath brain teaser,
Dare Obasanjo
- [ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor ..,
John Eadie
- RE: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Jeff Lowery
- XPath brain teaser,
Roger L. Costello
- PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Synopsis - An Open Letter to,
john hardin
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
pop3
- XSLT and Schemas,
Marcus Andersson
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Mayne, Peter
- XML web programming using VB,
WCUKegger
- RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Dare Obasanjo
- XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Jonathan Robie
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmentsin prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Jeff Tash
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-25,
Tech Support
- RE: Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...),
Jeff Lowery
- Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities,
john hardin
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- Re: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question),
Chiusano Joseph
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Schema validators,
Dare Obasanjo
- Schema validators,
Morcom, Harvey
- ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter,
xml-dev
- RE: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Nordström Ari
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21,
Tech Support
- RE: Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause?,
Eckenberger Axel
- Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause?,
Alexey Chub
- RE: Re: opposite of infoset,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Chris Wilper
- opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Robin Berjon
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- RSS for RSS?,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Tim Bray
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Thomas B. Passin
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Danny Ayers
- Re: opposite of infoset,
John Cowan
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Dimitre Novatchev
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Liam Quin
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Nordström Ari
- CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003,
akmal chaudhri
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Bruce.Cox
- RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Postel's Law Has No Exceptions,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
|
Cart