[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach

• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>,pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
• Subject: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:27:15 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030826014702.GD22176@m...>
• References: <5.1.1.5.2.20030825095256.00aa4af0@m...><3F436F08.98F7029B@b...><5.1.1.5.2.20030819162545.01c5af10@p...><3F410022.F6599E30@m...><3F410022.F6599E30@m...><5.1.1.5.2.20030819112123.00aa4b78@p...><5.1.1.5.2.20030819125723.030ebc78@m...><5.1.1.5.2.20030819162545.01c5af10@p...><5.1.1.5.2.20030820064638.00aa4b50@p...><3F436F08.98F7029B@b...><5.1.1.5.2.20030825095256.00aa4af0@m...>

Umm, reading Knuth got me certain that _assembler_ could be proven and had 
been proven in math, from which languages like Pascal and Fortan and 
Cobol  and C can also be, or rather have been proven, and since Java is 
just C transcendant then I feel that is also shown.

I do not feel that a markup language with patched on logic capacity can be 
mathematically shown to be a programming language at all....

Just my opinion.

Larry Bradshaw

At 09:47 PM 8/25/2003 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>pop3 scripsit:
>
> > Nor can I support folks in a CMM or ISO9000 shop
> > utilizing XML to any significant degree until they can show that XML is a
> > proven best practice, by rigorous scientific proofs.
>
>What programming language can you justify by "rigorous scientific
>[meaning mathematical?] proofs"?  Scheme and Prolog, maybe.
>
>--
>A mosquito cried out in his pain,               John Cowan
>"A chemist has poisoned my brain!"              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>         The cause of his sorrow                 http://www.reutershealth.com
>         Was para-dichloro-                      jcowan@r...
>Diphenyltrichloroethane.                                (aka DDT)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...>
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexlist <dbexlists@e...>
  • A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: lbradshaw@d...
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread