Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fra
I like what I see in TeraText, from their web site, but none of the situations of which I am aware can afford to treat the data elements, or XML data items, as text only. Every one of these applications has cause to use relations between normal forms of the data elements, and to do advanced indexing on various data types not just text, such as dates and date ranges, numerical process results (averages, means, distributions, etc), scientific enumerations and so on. Gov't docs are often like that - they are heavily laden with text or prose, but also have significant valuations in other data types including math equations with all sorts of notation formats or other readings such as pollution indexes from the EPA, or farm crop estimates vs. harvests by crop by month by county by year, or rainfall vs. temperature over time for each day by gps coordinate areas, etc. etc. On top of which it seems typical to gov't paper processes that rule-based activities or rule based processes prevail, are interdependent or subject to relations of various levels of complexity ranging from simple to quite complex, and are dynamic or subject to seemingly random changes, sometimes quite frequent changes. I can do rule based stuff like Prolog integration with a relational dbms, but I know of no Prolog-XML development path, or other rule based XML path that offers normal form relations. Think Library of Congress, and then consider a researcher wanting to correlate results across a variety of sciences, seeking both text and mathematical results from all available statistical items (published studies) as well as other results, such as a comparision / contrast of leading researcher articles in text form, but only the relevant sections & footnotes or references. For any given area of inquiry, over any time frame, any areas of science, etc.etc.etc. Kind of a Trantor University (Asimov) thing, I know, but as an end result my sense is that such is doable, and integration into a larger knowledge base should be a factor in every XML system out there, at least every gov't system, if you ask me. In other words, the TeraText approach does not seem to support relations between normal forms, and so seems to have a self imposed design limit that I, personally, find short of desirable. It is not just about massive data handling, but also about being able to do things with that data after it has been captured and has existed for some time, things that support requirements that are not yet known. In my opinion. Only normal forms and relational theory or the relational model (RM) offer this capability, in my opinion. Thanks for your response. At 03:21 PM 8/19/2003 -0400, Scott Parnell wrote: >I'm not sure if this meets your definition of an "XML only solution", but >you may want to take a look at what TeraText offers: >http://www.teratext.com.au/index.html > >Regards, >Scott > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <lbradshaw@d...> > > > > Ummm, the situation presented is that an XML only solution set can provide > > the needed functionality, response time, and other capabilities. > > > > No worries here that I can do this using a relational DBMS, normal forms, > > etc. But doing it only using XML constructs, and tools specific to XML, > > does not seem doable, reasonable, appropriate or supportable over time. > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an >initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > >The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format