[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach

• To: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
• Subject: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:47:02 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030825095256.00aa4af0@m...>
• References: <3F436F08.98F7029B@b...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819162545.01c5af10@p...> <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819112123.00aa4b78@p...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819125723.030ebc78@m...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819162545.01c5af10@p...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030820064638.00aa4b50@p...> <3F436F08.98F7029B@b...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030825095256.00aa4af0@m...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

pop3 scripsit:

> Nor can I support folks in a CMM or ISO9000 shop 
> utilizing XML to any significant degree until they can show that XML is a 
> proven best practice, by rigorous scientific proofs.

What programming language can you justify by "rigorous scientific
[meaning mathematical?] proofs"?  Scheme and Prolog, maybe.

-- 
A mosquito cried out in his pain,               John Cowan
"A chemist has poisoned my brain!"              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        The cause of his sorrow                 http://www.reutershealth.com
        Was para-dichloro-                      jcowan@r...
Diphenyltrichloroethane.                                (aka DDT)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• References:
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexlist <dbexlists@e...>
  • A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: lbradshaw@d...
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread