[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Random thoughts on reflection

• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: Random thoughts on reflection
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:20:29 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1060461629.8216.33.camel@delleric>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <1060455196.8225.12.camel@delleric> <16181.22133.628564.112605@m...> <1060461629.8216.33.camel@delleric>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> I should have presented Henry's proposal with more context, but the
> advantage of this syntax is that it can be extended to add annotations
> (for the PSVI for instance), solving another issue I have raised a
> couple of time which is that the XML syntax and infoset are not
> extensible.

I see an opportunity to use such a syntax as the primary tree on which XPathNG 
would work (seeing *everything* there as annotation). It might be simpler to 
start from there and then fall back to shortcuts mimicking XPath 1.0, as it 
would give us a consistent model to work on. Thoughts?

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • Random thoughts on reflection
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • re: Random thoughts on reflection
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • re: Random thoughts on reflection
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Previous by thread: Oasis website down?
• Next by thread: Re: Oasis website down?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread