|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML and the Relational Model [long]
[Jeff Lowery] > TPassin> > > * When is it better to store data in an XML format than in a relational > > > format - no fuzzy generalities, but a real discussion, please! > > What I'm saying is that there is no "relational format", so to speak. There > are storage formats optimized for general relational operations, but that > doesn't mean that other storage formats cannot support them. > Just sloppy language on my part, I know that "relational" does not mean a storage format. I did not really mean storage of bytes, but was thinking of the logical (or conceptual, if you like) level. For example, it is easy to model a two-level hierarchy in SQL, but it is awkward to model (and query) a hierarchy of an indefinite number of levels. So when the data model is deeply hierarchical, xml structures might have an advantage. If the data model is sparse, xml may be much better than a table-like model. Similarly when the contents of an element type may vary quite bit from one instance to another. On the other hand, if you create a well-normalized data model to begin with - when that is practical - you could probably implement it either with xml or with a relational database. What are the differentiators between going one way or the other? Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








