|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML and the Relational Model [long]
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Thomas B. Passin wrote: > Just sloppy language on my part, I know that "relational" does not mean a > storage format. I did not really mean storage of bytes, but was thinking of > the logical (or conceptual, if you like) level. > > For example, it is easy to model a two-level hierarchy in SQL, but it is > awkward to model (and query) a hierarchy of an indefinite number of levels. > So when the data model is deeply hierarchical, xml structures might have an > advantage. When you are thinking in terms of these, I think you should definitely see some of the best practices for hierarchical model. For example, look up any of the editions of "Fundamentals of Database Systems" by Elmasri/Navathe Jonathan Robie has worked on non-relational stores for XML, hopefully he can give a non-salesperson and convincing perspective, as to when non-relational store performs better than using relational stores.. note: relational store: storage model used for relational DBs.. cheers and regards - murali. > If the data model is sparse, xml may be much better than a table-like model. > Similarly when the contents of an element type may vary quite bit from one > instance to another. > > On the other hand, if you create a well-normalized data model to begin > with - when that is practical - you could probably implement it either with > xml or with a relational database. What are the differentiators between > going one way or the other?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








