|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 11:35:07PM +0100, Alaric B Snell wrote: > Liam Quin wrote: > > >>Adding even more confusion is the fact that the CFP pretty much puts gzip > >>up against ASN.1 when there are many more solutions, > > > >I hope we do get more solutions offered in position papers. > > How can you compare gzip and ASN.1? One's a function from bit strings to > (ideally smaller) bit strings, one's a function from information to bit > strings. I didn't compare them. The CFP mentions ASN.1 because some people have been experimenting with it; it wasn't intended to suggest anything further, but to encourage a diverse response. I couldn't give an exhaustive list, because there isn't a limited set of possible ways to share XML :-) so I mentioned two. It's not at all clear to me that they're mutually exclusive, too. > So compare XML to ASN.1's BER or PER, and gzipped XML to gzipped BER or > PER. That may indeed happen at the workshop. Best, Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, liam@w..., http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ Ankh's list of IRC clients: http://www.valinor.sorcery.net/clients/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








