[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensi

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:48:33 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC7D3@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC7D3@h...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:
> Right.  Is that a fair use?  Xerox machines are 
> provided in libraries.  It probably isn't but wouldn't 
> that mean some adjustments need to be made to the 
> fair use provisions?

Xerox machines are labeled with warnings about illegal copying,
which usually state what limitations the library places on their use.
Nobody can say, except a court, just what is or what is not fair use.

-- 
If you understand,                      John Cowan
   things are just as they are;         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand,               http://www.reutershealth.com
   things are just as they are.         jcowan@r...

• References:
  • RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL
• Next by Date: Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml
• Previous by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Next by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread