[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RelaxNG question

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG question
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:58:01 -0400
• In-reply-to: <03b501c365dc$6b2bd0f0$b6f5d3ce@s...>

jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>FWIW, RelaxNG can be used to define the RDF/XML syntax.
>http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-RELAXNG-Schema (the
>schema has some errors, but is close). Note that when viewed as
>compact RelaxNG, the RDF/XML syntax doesn't seem _all that_ complex.

Cool - what are the errors? 

The spec doesn't list them.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• References:
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by Date: The need for a formal description
• Previous by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread