XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - September, 2007

• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> on 30 Sep 2007 11:25:49 -0000
• Re: SQL4
  • From "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...> on 30 Sep 2007 11:03:06 -0000
• RE: XSD and references to additional namespace
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 30 Sep 2007 09:29:05 -0000
• RE: Selective restriction for attributes based on element values.
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 30 Sep 2007 09:24:49 -0000
• Re: Selective restriction for attributes based on elementvalues.
  • From Nagesh Subrahmanyam <nageshblore@g...> on 30 Sep 2007 08:31:11 -0000
• Re: Selective restriction for attributes based on elementvalues.
  • From Dennis Sterzenbach <lists@r...> on 30 Sep 2007 08:23:38 -0000
• Selective restriction for attributes based on element values.
  • From Nagesh Subrahmanyam <nageshblore@g...> on 30 Sep 2007 08:08:34 -0000
• XSD and references to additional namespace
  • From Dennis Sterzenbach <lists@r...> on 30 Sep 2007 06:48:39 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 23:50:34 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 29 Sep 2007 23:10:30 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 23:00:59 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:55:33 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?
  • From Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:42:11 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:14:11 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 19:11:34 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?
  • From Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 18:42:50 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 18:42:47 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 17:59:45 -0000
• Re: Problem searching the archives to find questionnaire schema
  • From "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 16:19:32 -0000
• Re: Problem searching the archives to find questionnaire schema
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 29 Sep 2007 16:13:32 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:51:47 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:44:08 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:39:14 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:28:34 -0000
• Problem searching the archives to find questionnaire schema
  • From "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:23:22 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:16:27 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 11:40:02 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 10:22:02 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 10:07:31 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 09:28:46 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 21:14:00 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 20:41:33 -0000
• Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 28 Sep 2007 20:25:35 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> on 28 Sep 2007 18:35:14 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 18:25:29 -0000
• Re: SQL4
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 28 Sep 2007 18:10:59 -0000
• RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?
  • From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:56:52 -0000
• [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:42:45 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:34:07 -0000
• RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:08:35 -0000
• RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require twobytes, right?
  • From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 16:52:11 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:59:11 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@g...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:35:50 -0000
• RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Erik Wright" <EWright@t...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:27:32 -0000
• FREE OASIS Identity and Trusted Infrastructure Workshop, Burton Group Catalyst Conference, 22 October, Barcelona, Spain
  • From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:25:19 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:25:01 -0000
• RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:22:33 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:21:25 -0000
• RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:20:59 -0000
• Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:19:46 -0000
• UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:13:08 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:38:05 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:21:56 -0000
• RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:05:27 -0000
• Re: SQL4
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 12:45:17 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 28 Sep 2007 12:12:27 -0000
• RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 08:52:02 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 07:26:04 -0000
• SQL4
  • From Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...> on 28 Sep 2007 06:17:06 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 27 Sep 2007 23:34:39 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 27 Sep 2007 23:23:53 -0000
• RE: [Summary #2] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 27 Sep 2007 17:58:25 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:56:34 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:38:04 -0000
• RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:22:05 -0000
• Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:19:54 -0000
• [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:16:06 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 26 Sep 2007 17:35:21 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 26 Sep 2007 16:46:46 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 16:15:35 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 26 Sep 2007 16:00:03 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 15:44:49 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 26 Sep 2007 14:56:15 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 14:30:34 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:53:31 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:52:07 -0000
• RE: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:03:54 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 26 Sep 2007 12:36:43 -0000
• Re: XML is text-only ... why?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 26 Sep 2007 12:32:09 -0000
• ANN: RenderX announces first release of VisualXSL.
  • From "Lyudmyla Novosilska" <lyudmylan@r...> on 26 Sep 2007 12:09:03 -0000
• XML is text-only ... why?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Sep 2007 11:59:56 -0000
• IDtrust 2008 Call for Papers (pka PKI R&D Workshop)
  • From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 24 Sep 2007 18:11:36 -0000
• Announcement - XEntrant XML Editor Release 0.2
  • From pr_admin@t... on 23 Sep 2007 19:01:36 -0000
• Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 21 Sep 2007 18:33:12 -0000
• RE: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 21 Sep 2007 18:31:11 -0000
• Real-World SOA and Web Services Case Studies at the Open Standards Forum
  • From "Jane Harnad" <jane.harnad@o...> on 21 Sep 2007 17:33:36 -0000
• Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g.encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Robin Cover <robin@o...> on 21 Sep 2007 16:45:37 -0000
• Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...> on 21 Sep 2007 16:30:55 -0000
• [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 21 Sep 2007 15:57:45 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 21 Sep 2007 11:45:21 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")putInside the XML Document?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 21 Sep 2007 09:45:08 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...> on 21 Sep 2007 09:10:38 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")putInside the XML Document?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 21 Sep 2007 07:31:23 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g.encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 21 Sep 2007 07:26:04 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 21 Sep 2007 01:31:04 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 18:30:18 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 20 Sep 2007 18:13:23 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 20 Sep 2007 18:05:58 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:50:33 -0000
• RE: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:45:48 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:05:50 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:56:54 -0000
• Re: Type inheritance in XML Schema
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:51:11 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:32:47 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:16:47 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:00:29 -0000
• Re: Type inheritance in XML Schema
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 15:58:36 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 15:47:12 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 15:36:38 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 14:03:10 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:57:07 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:52:56 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Jim Ancona <jim@a...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:43:46 -0000
• Type inheritance in XML Schema
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:42:00 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:41:38 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:34:32 -0000
• Re: SAX an working of the Parser
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:17:33 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:16:16 -0000
• [ANN] XSD/e 1.1.0 - validating XML parser generator for embedded systems
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:08:40 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:08:20 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:43:33 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:19:51 -0000
• [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:05:40 -0000
• RE: RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Contain a Start Child Element?
  • From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 11:50:20 -0000
• Re: RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Containa Start Child Element?
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@o...> on 20 Sep 2007 06:10:00 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 20 Sep 2007 01:54:57 -0000
• Re: <xs:all> with different elements in any order
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 20 Sep 2007 01:32:06 -0000
• ITU-T Newslog - Free access for all to ITU-T standards
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 00:48:25 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 19 Sep 2007 20:33:03 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 19 Sep 2007 18:35:17 -0000
• Re: RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Contain a Start Child Element?
  • From "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@g...> on 19 Sep 2007 17:54:12 -0000
• RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Contain a Start Child Element?
  • From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 19 Sep 2007 17:36:18 -0000
• RE: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 19 Sep 2007 17:27:21 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 19 Sep 2007 14:28:09 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:30:26 -0000
• Re: <xs:all> with different elements in any order
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:15:02 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:10:49 -0000
• Re: <xs:all> with different elements in any order
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@o...> on 19 Sep 2007 12:59:17 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 19 Sep 2007 12:57:05 -0000
• <xs:all> with different elements in any order
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 19 Sep 2007 12:43:19 -0000
• Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 19 Sep 2007 00:10:32 -0000
• Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 18 Sep 2007 23:53:49 -0000
• Re: XML Schema validation question
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Sep 2007 13:58:24 -0000
• RE: XML Schema validation question
  • From "Rodriguez, Oscar" <orodriguez@i...> on 18 Sep 2007 13:47:24 -0000
• PLAN-X 2008 second call for papers and demos
  • From "Ioana Manolescu" <imanolescu@g...> on 18 Sep 2007 12:36:24 -0000
• Re: XML Schema validation question
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 18 Sep 2007 11:07:45 -0000
• RE: XML Schema validation question
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Sep 2007 09:57:22 -0000
• Re: XML Schema validation question
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 18 Sep 2007 00:31:53 -0000
• XML Schema validation question
  • From "Rodriguez, Oscar" <orodriguez@i...> on 17 Sep 2007 22:28:22 -0000
• [Announce] Version 2008 of the Altova XML product line is available
  • From "ANNOUNCE" <announce@a...> on 17 Sep 2007 18:47:37 -0000
• SAX an working of the Parser
  • From "Zmitko, Jan" <Jan.Zmitko@A...> on 16 Sep 2007 20:38:54 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 14 Sep 2007 23:50:06 -0000
• OASIS Identity and Trusted Infrastructure Workshop at Burton Catalyst Europe, 22 October 2007
  • From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 14 Sep 2007 13:00:22 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 14 Sep 2007 12:53:44 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 14 Sep 2007 04:02:51 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 17:21:23 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 15:01:56 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:58:35 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:43:06 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:38:17 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:32:07 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:21:39 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 12:45:56 -0000
• Re: XML Schema to EBNF
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 13 Sep 2007 12:00:18 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 08:04:55 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 13 Sep 2007 07:50:37 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 07:33:46 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 06:54:00 -0000
• Re: XML Schema to EBNF
  • From "Suresh Joshee" <sjoshee@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 03:12:16 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 12 Sep 2007 20:24:40 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 20:13:39 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Sep 2007 19:25:49 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 18:33:23 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Sep 2007 15:08:43 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Sep 2007 13:54:57 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 08:01:22 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 07:31:10 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Frank Richards <frank@t...> on 12 Sep 2007 03:18:54 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Brendan Macmillan" <melbourne.research@g...> on 12 Sep 2007 02:34:37 -0000
• Announce: UBL International 2007 - registration now open; free seats for symposium are available (XML Dev)
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 12 Sep 2007 01:09:56 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documentsfrom 2007 ...
  • From Matej Cepl <mcepl@r...> on 11 Sep 2007 22:30:18 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archivedX ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...> on 11 Sep 2007 22:22:22 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 11 Sep 2007 22:07:04 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documentsfrom 2007 ...
  • From Matej Cepl <mcepl@r...> on 11 Sep 2007 21:59:56 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...> on 11 Sep 2007 21:08:14 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 11 Sep 2007 21:01:47 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Sep 2007 20:49:16 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...> on 11 Sep 2007 20:34:36 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Sep 2007 19:51:19 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 11 Sep 2007 17:25:49 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027,and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 11 Sep 2007 14:20:59 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...> on 11 Sep 2007 07:31:13 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Sep 2007 03:20:54 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 20:04:58 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Sep 2007 19:50:51 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 19:38:06 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 15:13:01 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 15:03:46 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:43:57 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:38:35 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:19:42 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:18:02 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:15:11 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:13:15 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:08:12 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 13:26:53 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 13:14:02 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From robert_weir@u... on 10 Sep 2007 13:03:32 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 12:33:02 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 10 Sep 2007 11:57:51 -0000
• Re: XML Schema to EBNF
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 10 Sep 2007 09:05:51 -0000
• RE: XML Schema to EBNF
  • From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...> on 10 Sep 2007 08:53:47 -0000
• RE: XML Schema to EBNF
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Sep 2007 07:59:36 -0000
• XML Schema to EBNF
  • From "Suresh Joshee" <sjoshee@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 04:48:48 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 10 Sep 2007 01:52:22 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 01:35:40 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 00:11:18 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 23:35:45 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From robert_weir@u... on 9 Sep 2007 23:17:04 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 22:55:02 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ...
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 9 Sep 2007 22:02:56 -0000
• RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:41:20 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:23:03 -0000
• Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:19:35 -0000
• The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:04:27 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 9 Sep 2007 18:50:27 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 9 Sep 2007 18:26:37 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 02:53:22 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 9 Sep 2007 02:07:46 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 9 Sep 2007 00:04:00 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 8 Sep 2007 23:36:47 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 19:29:38 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 8 Sep 2007 17:43:08 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 8 Sep 2007 15:24:35 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 8 Sep 2007 14:47:57 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2007 12:52:23 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Brendan Macmillan" <melbourne.research@g...> on 8 Sep 2007 10:59:39 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 09:04:14 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 08:27:16 -0000
• RE: CSS as XML
  • From "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@m...> on 7 Sep 2007 18:04:29 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 7 Sep 2007 16:33:54 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:33:53 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:18:18 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:08:36 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 13:38:56 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 12:56:12 -0000
• Re: CSS as XML
  • From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 7 Sep 2007 11:13:07 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael J. Ryan" <MJRyan@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 03:33:00 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From mcarr@a... on 7 Sep 2007 02:38:17 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From mcarr@a... on 7 Sep 2007 01:50:07 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 6 Sep 2007 23:48:00 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2007 22:33:28 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 22:14:33 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 22:00:45 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:51:24 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:39:30 -0000
• RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:38:34 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:32:16 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:31:58 -0000
• ISO comments?
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:42:35 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Alex Brown <adjb@a...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:27:06 -0000
• Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:17:41 -0000
• RE: CSS as XML
  • From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:09:06 -0000
• "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedishvote on OOXML?
  • From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 19:48:54 -0000
• RE: CSS as XML
  • From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 6 Sep 2007 19:19:09 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 18:15:04 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:45:22 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:34:05 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "ken_north@c..." <ken_north@c...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:30:40 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:28:00 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:24:51 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:19:52 -0000
• Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:19:28 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:08:49 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:00:37 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:55:05 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:44:46 -0000
• [Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:28:28 -0000
• Re: [ANN] XQuery Update Facility 1.0 published as LastCall WD
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:27:04 -0000
• Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:26:25 -0000
• [ANN] XQuery Update Facility 1.0 published as Last Call WD
  • From Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 15:18:26 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 15:06:30 -0000
• RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:37:16 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:31:02 -0000
• Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From "David Megginson" <david.megginson@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:12:34 -0000
• Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 13:54:14 -0000
• OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 13:38:34 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 13:01:21 -0000
• Re: CSS as XML
  • From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 09:50:03 -0000
• Re: CSS as XML
  • From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 6 Sep 2007 09:38:42 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...> on 6 Sep 2007 09:04:46 -0000
• Re: query on defining xml tags
  • From Brett Zamir <brettz9@y...> on 6 Sep 2007 07:26:54 -0000
• query on defining xml tags
  • From "Senthil Nathan" <rsennat@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 06:08:48 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 04:11:13 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@o...> on 6 Sep 2007 03:45:52 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 00:06:31 -0000
• Re: CSS as XML
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Sep 2007 20:35:55 -0000
• CSS as XML
  • From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 20:00:08 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 17:48:53 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 17:09:13 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:55:22 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:49:29 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:28:13 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 5 Sep 2007 16:21:10 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:09:41 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:05:45 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:43:49 -0000
• Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 5 Sep 2007 15:30:34 -0000
• Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo
  • From frank <frank@t...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:27:16 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:26:09 -0000
• Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:10:54 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:36:22 -0000
• Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:24:19 -0000
• Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:23:03 -0000
• Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:17:19 -0000
• CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo
  • From frank <frank@t...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:05:30 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:01:40 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 13:55:05 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Sep 2007 13:15:00 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 12:58:02 -0000
• RE: ENOUGH ALREADY
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 09:03:10 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 08:51:02 -0000
• Re: ENOUGH ALREADY
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Sep 2007 08:15:42 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 5 Sep 2007 06:28:09 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:58:16 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:36:12 -0000
• Re: ENOUGH ALREADY
  • From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:04:01 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 5 Sep 2007 02:18:22 -0000
• RE: ENOUGH ALREADY
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 01:56:38 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 5 Sep 2007 01:02:16 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...> on 5 Sep 2007 00:37:34 -0000
• ENOUGH ALREADY
  • From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 5 Sep 2007 00:04:13 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 4 Sep 2007 23:17:57 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 4 Sep 2007 23:10:10 -0000
• RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 23:02:58 -0000
• Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding'
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 22:46:33 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 19:30:01 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 19:16:11 -0000
• RE: Coverage from another 'bloid
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 16:22:07 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 16:04:04 -0000
• Coverage from another 'bloid
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 4 Sep 2007 15:37:45 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 15:36:18 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:34:17 -0000
• RE: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:22:18 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:13:33 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:06:46 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:46:10 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:44:47 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:19:04 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:08:49 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 09:55:00 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:42:50 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:23:12 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:04:49 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:00:37 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:47:12 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:45:58 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:21:15 -0000
• Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 05:40:27 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 05:13:21 -0000
• Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 04:01:03 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 03:56:02 -0000
• Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 03:08:23 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:49:01 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:36:48 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:28:37 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:10:08 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:03:28 -0000
• RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...> on 4 Sep 2007 00:47:46 -0000
• Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 23:33:48 -0000
• Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 3 Sep 2007 22:38:33 -0000
• Article on standards and Microsoft on NYT
  • From Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:45:39 -0000
• Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft
  • From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:32:24 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:27:56 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 20:57:48 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 19:26:58 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 18:14:00 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 17:48:16 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 17:36:05 -0000
• Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XMLdocument (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From frank <frank@t...> on 3 Sep 2007 17:03:41 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:47:09 -0000
• Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:41:18 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:34:54 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:33:43 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:02:35 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From Bart Schuller <schuller+xml-dev@l...> on 3 Sep 2007 15:19:32 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 3 Sep 2007 15:02:03 -0000
• RE: END: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Mark C. Allman" <mcallman@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 12:20:41 -0000
• [ANN] Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 released
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 3 Sep 2007 11:57:30 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 08:23:04 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 08:11:29 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 07:55:34 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 07:45:53 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 07:43:25 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 3 Sep 2007 06:25:24 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 3 Sep 2007 05:54:43 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 3 Sep 2007 04:43:44 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 04:16:53 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 03:02:52 -0000
• Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@g...> on 3 Sep 2007 00:07:22 -0000
• Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 2 Sep 2007 22:35:06 -0000
• Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@g...> on 2 Sep 2007 21:47:00 -0000
• Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:44:12 -0000
• Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:38:14 -0000
• RE: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:34:39 -0000
• Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:01:19 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 14:51:16 -0000
• CfPart: International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications(RuleML-2007)
  • From Adrian Paschke <paschke@i...> on 2 Sep 2007 13:03:12 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 2 Sep 2007 10:02:45 -0000
• Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 2 Sep 2007 05:00:15 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:45:51 -0000
• RE: RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:44:11 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:38:33 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:33:35 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:29:42 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:26:39 -0000
• RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:07:32 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 1 Sep 2007 20:49:48 -0000
• Re: Political opinions and this list
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 1 Sep 2007 18:13:24 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Mark C. Allman" <mcallman@a...> on 1 Sep 2007 16:28:38 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 1 Sep 2007 16:13:55 -0000
• RE: Political opinions and this list
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 1 Sep 2007 15:30:56 -0000
• RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 1 Sep 2007 15:25:55 -0000