[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
> OOXML didn't make it in the first round balloting for fast > track acceptance. What should happen now? Excellent question. The ideal perhaps is that the ODF and OOXML players should get around the table and design a single specification with a central core that everyone agrees on, and with sufficient extensibility to permit the necessary evils like "doWordWrapLikeWord95" in separate namespaces to allow round-trippability. With two specifications on the table it ought to be possible to see what's common and what isn't, and the best standards often come from abstracting what's common between existing implementations. The danger of course is that such a process will take too long to make any results useful. But in my view standards are only useful if they are technically and economically capable of leading to multiple independent and interoperable implementations. I don't think there's anything wrong with OOXML becoming a standard if it can be demonstrated that it meets those criteria: from the evidence that's been given on this list, it looks as if that process too will take some time. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|