[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - September, 2007
RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:34:17 -0000
RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 19:30:01 -0000
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 1 Sep 2007 15:30:56 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:29:42 -0000
Re: Political opinions and this list, From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 3 Sep 2007 04:43:44 -0000
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 3 Sep 2007 15:02:03 -0000
Re: Political opinions and this list, From Bart Schuller <schuller+xml-dev@l...> on 3 Sep 2007 15:19:32 -0000
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:02:35 -0000
Re: Political opinions and this list, From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 1 Sep 2007 20:49:48 -0000
RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: Political opinions and this list, From "John F Covin" <johnfcovin@f...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:07:32 -0000
RE: RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: Political opinions and this list, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:44:11 -0000
Re: Political opinions and this list, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:33:43 -0000
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:38:33 -0000
RE: Political opinions and this list, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2007 02:26:39 -0000
Followups by message-id references
CfPart: International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications(RuleML-2007), From Adrian Paschke <paschke@i...> on 2 Sep 2007 13:03:12 -0000
Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:01:19 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XML document (UTF-8): what happens?, From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@g...> on 3 Sep 2007 00:07:22 -0000
Re: Copying text (curly quotes) from Word into an XMLdocument (UTF-8): what happens?, From frank <frank@t...> on 3 Sep 2007 17:03:41 -0000
Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:38:14 -0000
Followups by message-id references
"Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedishvote on OOXML?, From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 19:48:54 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:17:41 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:31:58 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 12:56:12 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 13:38:56 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:08:36 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:18:18 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 7 Sep 2007 15:33:53 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 08:27:16 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 09:04:14 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Brendan Macmillan" <melbourne.research@g...> on 8 Sep 2007 10:59:39 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2007 12:52:23 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 8 Sep 2007 14:47:57 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 8 Sep 2007 19:29:38 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Alex Brown <adjb@a...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:27:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- ISO comments?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:42:35 -0000
Followups by subject
- Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 2 Sep 2007 20:44:12 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 03:02:52 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 04:16:53 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 3 Sep 2007 05:54:43 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 3 Sep 2007 06:25:24 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 08:11:29 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 08:23:04 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 07:55:34 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:34:54 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:47:09 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:45:58 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:42:50 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 09:55:00 -0000
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 15:36:18 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 16:04:04 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 19:16:11 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 4 Sep 2007 23:10:10 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 5 Sep 2007 02:18:22 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:36:12 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:08:49 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:19:04 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:44:47 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2007 12:46:10 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 20:57:48 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 05:13:21 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:00:37 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:23:12 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 3 Sep 2007 17:36:05 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:21:15 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 06:47:12 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 4 Sep 2007 07:04:49 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 4 Sep 2007 14:13:33 -0000
- Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:39:30 -0000
- RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 3 Sep 2007 07:45:53 -0000
[ANN] Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 released, From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 3 Sep 2007 11:57:30 -0000
RE: END: Political opinions and this list, From "Mark C. Allman" <mcallman@a...> on 3 Sep 2007 12:20:41 -0000
Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 16:41:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:27:56 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Followups by subject
Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:32:24 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:03:28 -0000
Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 03:08:23 -0000
Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...> on 4 Sep 2007 04:01:03 -0000
Re: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 4 Sep 2007 05:40:27 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 12:58:02 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:36:22 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 00:06:31 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...> on 6 Sep 2007 09:04:46 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 13:01:21 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:10:08 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 4 Sep 2007 02:28:37 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Article on standards and Microsoft on NYT, From Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...> on 3 Sep 2007 21:45:39 -0000
Coverage from another 'bloid, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 4 Sep 2007 15:37:45 -0000
RE: Coverage from another 'bloid, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 16:22:07 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: ENOUGH ALREADY, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 01:56:38 -0000
Re: ENOUGH ALREADY, From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:04:01 -0000
Re: ENOUGH ALREADY, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Sep 2007 08:15:42 -0000
RE: ENOUGH ALREADY, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 09:03:10 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...> on 5 Sep 2007 00:37:34 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 5 Sep 2007 01:02:16 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 5 Sep 2007 06:28:09 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 13:55:05 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:01:40 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 17:09:13 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 17:48:53 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 04:11:13 -0000
RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:31:02 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 5 Sep 2007 03:58:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 4 Sep 2007 23:02:58 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:55:22 -0000
Re: NY Times reference to 'secret coding', From "ken_north@c..." <ken_north@c...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:30:40 -0000
RE: Article on nytimes.com about Microsoft, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Sep 2007 13:15:00 -0000
CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo, From frank <frank@t...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:05:30 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:23:03 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: CDATA Section from JSP/ATG Dynamo, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 14:24:19 -0000
Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:10:54 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 5 Sep 2007 15:43:49 -0000
Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:05:45 -0000
Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:09:41 -0000
Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 5 Sep 2007 16:21:10 -0000
Re: Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 5 Sep 2007 16:28:13 -0000
[Summary] Dangers of Copying Text into an XML Document, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 6 Sep 2007 16:28:28 -0000
Followups by message-id references
CSS as XML, From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 5 Sep 2007 20:00:08 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: CSS as XML, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Sep 2007 20:35:55 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: CSS as XML, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 6 Sep 2007 09:38:42 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: CSS as XML, From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 6 Sep 2007 19:19:09 -0000
Re: CSS as XML, From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 09:50:03 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: CSS as XML, From "Fraser Hore" <fraserhore@h...> on 6 Sep 2007 20:09:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: CSS as XML, From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 7 Sep 2007 11:13:07 -0000
query on defining xml tags, From "Senthil Nathan" <rsennat@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 06:08:48 -0000
Followups by message-id references
OOXML: So what *should* happen now?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 6 Sep 2007 13:38:34 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?, From "David Megginson" <david.megginson@g...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:12:34 -0000
RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2007 14:37:16 -0000
Re: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 6 Sep 2007 17:19:28 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: OOXML: So what *should* happen now?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 15:06:30 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Followups by subject
[ANN] XQuery Update Facility 1.0 published as Last Call WD, From Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 15:18:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 21:38:34 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael J. Ryan" <MJRyan@s...> on 7 Sep 2007 03:33:00 -0000
Followups by subject
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 7 Sep 2007 16:33:54 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 8 Sep 2007 15:24:35 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 8 Sep 2007 17:43:08 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 8 Sep 2007 23:36:47 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 9 Sep 2007 00:04:00 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 9 Sep 2007 02:07:46 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 02:53:22 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 9 Sep 2007 18:26:37 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 9 Sep 2007 18:50:27 -0000
- The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:04:27 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:19:35 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:23:03 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Sep 2007 20:41:20 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 9 Sep 2007 22:02:56 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 22:55:02 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From robert_weir@u... on 9 Sep 2007 23:17:04 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 9 Sep 2007 23:35:45 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 00:11:18 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 15:13:01 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 01:35:40 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 10 Sep 2007 01:52:22 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 12:33:02 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:08:12 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:19:42 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 13:14:02 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:15:11 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documentsfrom 2007 ..., From Matej Cepl <mcepl@r...> on 11 Sep 2007 22:30:18 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 19:38:06 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Sep 2007 19:50:51 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 11 Sep 2007 03:20:54 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...> on 11 Sep 2007 07:31:13 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027,and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 11 Sep 2007 14:20:59 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 08:01:22 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 11 Sep 2007 17:25:49 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 11 Sep 2007 22:07:04 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 17:21:23 -0000
- Re: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoftbuys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:38:35 -0000
- RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 15:03:46 -0000
RE: "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: Micros oft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Sep 2007 22:00:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: CSS as XML, From "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@m...> on 7 Sep 2007 18:04:29 -0000
XML Schema to EBNF, From "Suresh Joshee" <sjoshee@g...> on 10 Sep 2007 04:48:48 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: XML Schema to EBNF, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Sep 2007 07:59:36 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: XML Schema to EBNF, From "Suresh Joshee" <sjoshee@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 03:12:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: XML Schema to EBNF, From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...> on 10 Sep 2007 08:53:47 -0000
RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 13:26:53 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Followups by subject
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 20:04:58 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Sep 2007 19:51:19 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Sep 2007 20:49:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Sep 2007 13:54:57 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Sep 2007 19:25:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Sep 2007 20:13:39 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 12 Sep 2007 20:24:40 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 06:54:00 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 07:33:46 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 13 Sep 2007 07:50:37 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2007 08:04:55 -0000
- Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XMLdocuments from 2007 ..., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:32:07 -0000
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 12:45:56 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 15:01:56 -0000
RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Sep 2007 14:18:02 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Sep 2007 13:43:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived X ML documents from 2007 ..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 14 Sep 2007 12:53:44 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Announce: UBL International 2007 - registration now open; free seats for symposium are available (XML Dev), From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 12 Sep 2007 01:09:56 -0000
OASIS Identity and Trusted Infrastructure Workshop at Burton Catalyst Europe, 22 October 2007, From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 14 Sep 2007 13:00:22 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: XML Schema validation question, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 18 Sep 2007 09:57:22 -0000
Re: XML Schema validation question, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 18 Sep 2007 11:07:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
SAX an working of the Parser, From "Zmitko, Jan" <Jan.Zmitko@A...> on 16 Sep 2007 20:38:54 -0000
Followups by message-id references
[Announce] Version 2008 of the Altova XML product line is available, From "ANNOUNCE" <announce@a...> on 17 Sep 2007 18:47:37 -0000
PLAN-X 2008 second call for papers and demos, From "Ioana Manolescu" <imanolescu@g...> on 18 Sep 2007 12:36:24 -0000
Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 18 Sep 2007 23:53:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 19 Sep 2007 12:57:05 -0000
Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:10:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:30:26 -0000
Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 19 Sep 2007 14:28:09 -0000
RE: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) put Inside the XML Document?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 19 Sep 2007 17:27:21 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 19 Sep 2007 18:35:17 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 20 Sep 2007 01:54:57 -0000
- [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:05:40 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:43:33 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:08:20 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:34:32 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:41:38 -0000
- RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:52:56 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:57:07 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 14:03:10 -0000
- RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 15:36:38 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:00:29 -0000
- RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:05:50 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 20 Sep 2007 18:05:58 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 18:30:18 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g.encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...> on 21 Sep 2007 07:26:04 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 21 Sep 2007 01:31:04 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")putInside the XML Document?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 21 Sep 2007 07:31:23 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...> on 21 Sep 2007 09:10:38 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")putInside the XML Document?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 21 Sep 2007 09:45:08 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 21 Sep 2007 11:45:21 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:32:47 -0000
- RE: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:50:33 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 20 Sep 2007 18:13:23 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 15:47:12 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:16:47 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 20 Sep 2007 16:56:54 -0000
- [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 21 Sep 2007 15:57:45 -0000
- Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@g...> on 21 Sep 2007 16:30:55 -0000
- Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 21 Sep 2007 18:33:12 -0000
- Re: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g.encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From Robin Cover <robin@o...> on 21 Sep 2007 16:45:37 -0000
- RE: [Summary #2] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8") put Inside the XML Document?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 21 Sep 2007 18:31:11 -0000
- Re: [Summary] Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8")put Inside the XML Document?, From Jim Ancona <jim@a...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:43:46 -0000
- Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 20 Sep 2007 12:19:51 -0000
- Re: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:16:16 -0000
- RE: Why is Encoding Metadata (e.g. encoding="UTF-8) putInside the XML Document?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 20 Sep 2007 17:45:48 -0000
<xs:all> with different elements in any order, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 19 Sep 2007 12:43:19 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: <xs:all> with different elements in any order, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 19 Sep 2007 13:15:02 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Contain a Start Child Element?, From "Rudick, Tom" <tmrudick@m...> on 19 Sep 2007 17:36:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: RELAX NG: Are Grammar Elements Always Required to Containa Start Child Element?, From George Cristian Bina <george@o...> on 20 Sep 2007 06:10:00 -0000
Followups by message-id references
ITU-T Newslog - Free access for all to ITU-T standards, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 20 Sep 2007 00:48:25 -0000
[ANN] XSD/e 1.1.0 - validating XML parser generator for embedded systems, From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:08:40 -0000
Type inheritance in XML Schema, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 20 Sep 2007 13:42:00 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Real-World SOA and Web Services Case Studies at the Open Standards Forum, From "Jane Harnad" <jane.harnad@o...> on 21 Sep 2007 17:33:36 -0000
Announcement - XEntrant XML Editor Release 0.2, From pr_admin@t... on 23 Sep 2007 19:01:36 -0000
IDtrust 2008 Call for Papers (pka PKI R&D Workshop), From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 24 Sep 2007 18:11:36 -0000
XML is text-only ... why?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Sep 2007 11:59:56 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: XML is text-only ... why?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 26 Sep 2007 12:36:43 -0000
RE: XML is text-only ... why?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:52:07 -0000
Re: XML is text-only ... why?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:53:31 -0000
Re: XML is text-only ... why?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 26 Sep 2007 14:56:15 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: XML is text-only ... why?, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 26 Sep 2007 17:35:21 -0000
[Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:16:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:19:54 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:38:04 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:56:34 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 27 Sep 2007 23:23:53 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 27 Sep 2007 23:34:39 -0000
- RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 08:52:02 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 28 Sep 2007 12:12:27 -0000
- Message not available
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 07:26:04 -0000
- RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:05:27 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:21:56 -0000
- Re: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 13:38:05 -0000
- RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:20:59 -0000
- RE: [Summary #2] XML is text-only ... why?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 27 Sep 2007 17:58:25 -0000
ANN: RenderX announces first release of VisualXSL., From "Lyudmyla Novosilska" <lyudmylan@r...> on 26 Sep 2007 12:09:03 -0000
RE: XML is text-only ... why?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 13:03:54 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: XML is text-only ... why?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 15:44:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: XML is text-only ... why?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 26 Sep 2007 16:15:35 -0000
RE: [Summary] XML is text-only ... why?, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 27 Sep 2007 15:22:05 -0000
SQL4, From Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...> on 28 Sep 2007 06:17:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: SQL4, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 12:45:17 -0000
Re: SQL4, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...> on 28 Sep 2007 18:10:59 -0000
Re: SQL4, From "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...> on 30 Sep 2007 11:03:06 -0000
UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:13:08 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:21:25 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:22:33 -0000
Re: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requiretwo bytes, right?, From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:25:01 -0000
RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require twobytes, right?, From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 16:52:11 -0000
[Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:42:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?, From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 17:56:52 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 18:25:29 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 28 Sep 2007 20:25:35 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 28 Sep 2007 21:14:00 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 10:07:31 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:28:34 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:44:08 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 28 Sep 2007 20:41:33 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 09:28:46 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 10:22:02 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 11:40:02 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:16:27 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:39:14 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:51:47 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 17:59:45 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 18:42:47 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 29 Sep 2007 23:00:59 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 29 Sep 2007 19:11:34 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 29 Sep 2007 23:10:30 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> on 29 Sep 2007 23:50:34 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?, From Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 18:42:50 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:14:11 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?, From Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:42:11 -0000
- RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...> on 29 Sep 2007 20:55:33 -0000
- Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?, From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> on 30 Sep 2007 11:25:49 -0000
FREE OASIS Identity and Trusted Infrastructure Workshop, Burton Group Catalyst Conference, 22 October, Barcelona, Spain, From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@o...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:25:19 -0000
RE: UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?, From "Erik Wright" <EWright@t...> on 28 Sep 2007 15:27:32 -0000
Problem searching the archives to find questionnaire schema, From "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...> on 29 Sep 2007 14:23:22 -0000
Followups by message-id references
XSD and references to additional namespace, From Dennis Sterzenbach <lists@r...> on 30 Sep 2007 06:48:39 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Selective restriction for attributes based on element values., From Nagesh Subrahmanyam <nageshblore@g...> on 30 Sep 2007 08:08:34 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: Selective restriction for attributes based on element values., From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 30 Sep 2007 09:24:49 -0000
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
 |
Atom 0.3 |
 |
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|