[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML docu

• From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:32:47 -0700

>> SNIA created a 100 year archive task force and it has a working group 
>> developing
>> a spec for a standard for an archival storage container. It's called the
>> Self-Describing, Self-Contained Data Format (SD-SCDF).
>> http://www.snia-dmf.org/library/SNIA-DMF_Towards_%20SD-SCDF_20070412.pdf

The XAM architecture spec 0.64 includes an example of XSet representation for an 
export operation:

<xsets xmlns="http://www.snia.org/2006/xam/export"
 xmlns:xop="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/xop/include"
 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
 xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.snia.org/2006/xam/export/XSet_v1.0spec.xsd">
 <xset xmlns="http://www.snia.org/2006/xam/export" version="1.1.0"
 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
 xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.snia.org/2006/xam/export XSet_v1.1.xsd">

The self-describing, self-contained data format designed for a 100-year storage 
requirement is based on XAM. Isn't there an inherent problem that there are 
dependencies (namespaces and schema) on www.W3.org and www.snia.org? What 
assurance is there those domains will exist for 20 years, much less 100?





======== Ken North ===========
www.KNComputing.com

www.WebServicesSummit.com
www.SQLSummit.com
www.GridSummit.com


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php 

• References:
  • RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
    • From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>
  • RE: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
    • From: "Paul Kiel" <paul@x...>
  • Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
    • From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...>
  • Re: The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>